|
||||
06-07-2007, 11:39 PM
The anime is currently only in Japanese, but the manga is printed in English. I love the L plushie on pg. 19!~ I was going to get one like it and they sold out T__T L ish voiced by Kappei Yamaguchi!!! -fangirl moment- Anyway, I love Death Note and I am impatiently waiting for the last volume! o(≧∀≦)o I's got a family now -panda dance!- Sister to: lollijenn, ToKyObOxRoBoT Daughter of: Maku Niece of: NanteNa Fishy: Kittenx, Samurai Bodyguard: TheUnknown Winnie the Pooh loving cousin to: ilovedaisuke7 Beneath Your S.K.I.N. @ Last.FM |
|
||||
06-08-2007, 11:50 AM
Quote:
Your comparison is clearly irrelevant. You can't just compare a murderer to a small-time troublemaker in school. Which would you rather have sitting beside you in the train or bus? There's obviously a world of difference between the latter and former. However, if you want to proportionalize it, you wouldn't be dead, since a heavy punishment neutralizes a heavy crime, whilst a lighter punishment would suffice for a lighter crime. Stating something as a pretence is akin to claiming something is false, all the more for a concurrence not to be reached. Give me a greater suited illustration then we'll discuss this. Also, welcome to Earth - not having a purpose to live isn't a crime here. Haha, excuse me for finding faults in a debate then. XD I'll admit that Light made some mistakes in his reign, but I have already gone through this; humans err, there's no helping it, but there is no stopping them from striving either. E.g. L lost because he underestimated Light. He was the one who'd intitally issued a challenge on Kira thus, L should be responsible for his own miscalculations and loss. Re-watch the episode where L got killed and take a good look at his plainly surprised facial expression - that's the evidence I present to you. It's redundant pointing out their flaws since they cancel each other out (although Light still won in the end) and so, won't do us any gains. In addition, in the first few episodes, Light'd been writing the names of criminals down from the "worldwide" news report, even when he was under surveillance by L, and that includes "major criminals in different countries" that I daresay were more than a mere five each. "killing the criminals from different accidents WUD b suspisious"? What are you talking about? Wouldn't killing them using different methods be less suspicious, duh? And why are you linking the statement with the assassination of Taylor L.? I mean, I would understand if you're comparing the way two or more persons were eliminated, but I'm afraid don't see a link here. Now that's simply absurd. No matter which criminal one killed, surely anyone who had been a victim of the given criminal would be grateful and maybe even think of it as "god answering their prayers". To top it, people sharing the same ideals as Mikami WOULD have thought this to a bigger extent as "god finally answering their prayers" if he HAD killed Taylor L. Even if Light had not done that, it would not cause the slightest change in what supportes of Light think of him, because one criminal doesn't come close to the thousands Light's eradicated. Or are you refering to the other sort of God - the One actually living in heaven? Fine, I'll play along with both scenarios. Because the One in heaven is literally all-seeing, would it not make higher sense if you'd made a reference (because you used "since") to a criminal off the worldwide news report, instead? I have gone through this as well - "killing criminals with different incidents" would NOT push suspicion towards Light at all. The most it'd do is help people realize that the deaths have indeed been deliberate, which is what Light wants: Recognition from people as Kira, that this is no coincidence, that he solely is a solid natural entity, willing to convict criminals. Taking into detailed consideration that humans err and easily miscalculate, this will instill fear in potential or already-are criminals hence, forcing them to abide by a "play safe" principle. There's no such thing as happy endings, for when you find true love, happiness is everlasting.
|
|
||||
06-08-2007, 11:51 AM
Who is to say God wouldn't get mad at "L"? No one on this planet can fully tell what God is feeling because there is no proof for his existence, let alone meeting him to find out. One doesn't have to be a criminal to get God or anyone mad. If one persists in obstructing justice, that alone is sufficient to incur divine wrath. I know God is omniscient and sees all, but Light isn't the One above and prefers people to acknowledge and discern his presence. Besides, killing Taylor L. on the fated same day God intended for him to die, would prove Light as a true follower of God.
I agree with you Light brought about his temporary downfall in this situation, but I won't bother to elaborate further because I have already argued on it earlier on, so please counter me from there to prevent iterative debates. But I'll have to disagree with you on the part about "the way he talked". How was Light to know and judge how L spoke? It looks to me you got Light's and your own viewpoints mixed up. =/ Furthermore, even if Light had heard L talking before, Talor L. could have been specially instructed to sound like L and purposefully trained to give the same impression by his tone and other voice-related non-verbal mannerisms. That's an ignorant assumption you're making by insinuating that L was expecting it. Proof, evidence, and logic are fundemental debate cores and values. Sorry to burst your bubble, L had created the *delete* button LONG before Light found the death note because every human has to die one day; no one is immortal. It wasn't for a specific reason like knowing he'd die at the hands of Light. When you used "thts y", which I'm LOGICALLY assuming it means "that's why", you're relating the two separate matters together and squeezing your assumptions into facts, which I might add is really twisting of words. Yes, L might have known whatever, but getting killed by Light is still a tragic loss for the police. There were no deaths on Light's side, which means he's leading. Though I guess L did not know Kira would have helpers on his side too, setting the battlefield on a par, eh? Quote:
You know, I don't think it'd be over if Light dies either, because if he does, the odds shall be evened out and Mikami will most probably assume the position with Takada, and fight it out with Near and Mello. While your reason appears logical, another reason why L did not give the information directly to Near could be because L wasn't anticipating Light's triumph over him. Have you ever heard of the phrase "Don't judge a book by its cover"? Again with only looking on the surface, it's giving us Light supporters every reason to dislike L as well. I personally find the blue glow for L look sinister too, but I have no basis for that and neither do you; "To each his own" then. Lol, it isn't weird to us, it makes every sense in the world. Would you rather Light went on a rampage killing newborn babies, you tell me?? Light does not kill anyone who does something wrong. That depends on mainly three things: Repentance, offence, and circumstance. No one said anyone who does anything wrong is a 'true' criminal and no one has labelled it so yet. Ahhh... See what I mean? Anger is your only reason. I have reasons, truths, facts and every possible theory backing my words up and my stand for supporting Light. No one said you had to stick with it either. I'm not forcing you, you can forfeit if you want. The one thing able to change my mind however, is if someone can overcome my points and make me shut up in the process. Prehaps that's why you'd like to "stick with it"? I'm sure I don't know. Don't get me wrong, I would reeeaaalyyy love to shoot my points more accurately right back at cha, but I really can't understand certain things you're saying and I'm strongly perturbed/annoyed/pissed off by the thought. It could be due to your illness or whatever, but could you maybe try not to use so many shortforms in your posts? It makes it difficult to get your meaning across and I'm already deeply confused by your first paragraph Oh, and a pointer: Always check your posts before & after submitting it, it helpes to cut down on errors like that. Any other L supporters who feel they're up to the task may very well help themselves. P.S. If you're sick, don't bother debating until you're good again, it's rather redundant if you can't be serious. And you'd better get better!!! Or I'll cry.... ;_; 2nd P.S. Don't expect me not to argue against anything against Light. As a Light supporter, I feel you're asking the impossible after seeing you diss him. As a person, it goes against my nature. I see L's purpose clearly, whether I see it in a better way or not as compared to Light's depends on his cause for the purpose. BUT, the question on my mind is, do you view Light's purpose in a logical way? It seems to me supportes of L are always looking on the mere surface, aren't you guys? Blindly and ignorantly claiming something is that way without being able to back it up or take on someone else's challenge There's no such thing as happy endings, for when you find true love, happiness is everlasting.
|
|
||||
06-09-2007, 01:17 PM
Quote:
I don't blindly or ignorantly claim anything. I always have words to back up my feelings. I could just ramble on an on about things that don't even relate to DN. But I don't....So don't generalize the L's for I am not this way. I stopped debating with you because we just kept on saying the same things over and over. We just used different words. So that's why I didn't take anymore of your challenges. |
|
||||
06-09-2007, 05:07 PM
Well, whaddaya know, another set of contradictory words... What you say can be used against you in erm, this thread! XD So choose your words carefully or be prepared to defend them. Anyway, I'm deeply apologetic for generalizing and I'm sorry, I made a wrong choice of words as well it seems. ^_^;
There's no such thing as happy endings, for when you find true love, happiness is everlasting.
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|