|
||||
sorta not -
09-11-2008, 06:48 PM
The McCain hit piece on Obama supporting 'Sex Education for Kids' is a direct lift from 2004' Senate Race btwn Alan Keyes Republican canidate and Obama Democrat canidate. This campaign was hilighted by how low Alan Keyes and the Republican 'PR' machine would wallow in slinging mud. This campaign ended with Alan Keyes losing in a landslide win for Obama in 2004' senate race marked by it's 'nastyness'. fyi Obama did not sponsor this bill.
|
|
||||
09-11-2008, 08:17 PM
Well, the goal seems to be to win first, and worry about consequences later. Obama made a safe, and obvious choice, but a good one as a vice-president.
McCain chose someone who can help him get elected, but is going to be like a fish-out-of-water if she actually has to live in Washington DC |
|
||||
09-12-2008, 03:31 AM
No, it is not a tie, McCain is ahead. In no poll currently available is Obama ahead.
It's funny that only when McCain is ahead in the polls is the race a "statistical dead heat", whereas if Obama is 2 points ahead the quote is "Obama leads in the polls". All this comes despite front page stories about "troopergate", qualifications and experience (or lack thereof), and despite the type of "factual" reporting I mentioned above. And even despite the fact that Obama has raised twice as much money as McCain. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|