JapanForum.com  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
(#11 (permalink))
Old
noodle's Avatar
noodle (Offline)
Wo zhi dao ni ai wo
 
Posts: 1,418
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Paris/London/Algiers
02-02-2009, 04:32 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hisuwashi View Post
You can have 2 children in a rural area of China if the first is a girl or disabled. But otherwise, they force women to get abortions, or you can lose rights to free education for your children and other rights. Also the fact that families want boys first and foremost means there are now nearly 3 males to every 2 females in China. But you can't really blame them.
I'm not too sure if you're talking about China today or 30+ years ago. As for Rural China, where is that exactly? Places like Tibet for example don't even have this one Child Policy and you can't really get more rural than that!

Lol, the 3 for 2 isn't so bad... You should check the ratio's for India!
Reply With Quote
(#12 (permalink))
Old
Hisuwashi's Avatar
Hisuwashi (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 541
Join Date: Sep 2006
02-02-2009, 04:36 PM

Rural China = any kind of settlement in The People's Republic of China (ok, excluding Tibet, who are autonomous anyway) without at least a non-agricultural population of 100,000.

City - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


~ Wind Song ~
~ Windlied ~
~ Chant du vent ~

Last edited by Hisuwashi : 02-02-2009 at 04:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
(#13 (permalink))
Old
Jaydelart's Avatar
Jaydelart (Offline)
ジェイデラート
 
Posts: 777
Join Date: Apr 2008
02-08-2009, 01:13 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salvanas View Post
As we all know, there's a current law in China where you are fined if you have more than one (Or was it two?) child/ren.

I for one, think this should be applied, short term, for the whole world. At a maximum of two children per couple. It would reduce the stress on the lack of resources we have at this moment.

What are your thoughts?
You get fines for damaging property or littering... are we placing human lives in the same category as objects? I think if people choose to have more than 2 children, they should have the freedom to do so without being "punished".
As for the world's resources, we could always try to be more responsible.
Reply With Quote
(#14 (permalink))
Old
superheel's Avatar
superheel (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 283
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Proud Pinoy!
02-08-2009, 02:22 AM

I think this should apply to some countries in the world. China really needs that law, and maybe they should make a law that each couple should have atleast 1 daughter. China needs women.


"Save the earth from Global Warming!"
Reply With Quote
(#15 (permalink))
Old
Nagoyankee's Avatar
Nagoyankee (Offline)
中庸を得るのだ~
 
Posts: 2,119
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tokyo, Japan
02-08-2009, 05:38 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by superheel View Post
China really needs that law, and maybe they should make a law that each couple should have atleast 1 daughter. China needs women.
Just whatever for?
Reply With Quote
(#16 (permalink))
Old
Yuna7780's Avatar
Yuna7780 (Offline)
I'm Missh Yuna! ♥
 
Posts: 1,168
Join Date: Aug 2007
02-08-2009, 05:53 AM

I know that China has a population problem... But I just don't think it's right to not be able to have more than one/two children. It's one of those personal things.


Thanks for reading!
~Yuna7780
Reply With Quote
(#17 (permalink))
Old
mrnicekid's Avatar
mrnicekid (Offline)
JF Regular
 
Posts: 54
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Akita City
02-08-2009, 06:19 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuna7780 View Post
I know that China has a population problem... But I just don't think it's right to not be able to have more than one/two children. It's one of those personal things.
when i first heard about the china's one-child policy, my first reaction is just like you.

then i met real chinese people, and through our discussion, it was obvious that the policy is much needed in a big country like china. it's whether the one child policy, or china separated into various countries for easier governance.

the thing is, they also spoke about rural families taking medication so that when a mother gave birth, she would gave birth to as many children as possible, because it is OK to have multiple children, as long as they came during the same birth. pills to make quadruplets were widely use, because rural families need several strong sons to help them with their farm etc.

the importance of having a son is also significant, as the son is going to bear the family name, and since the wife is going to be with her husband, the family with only one daughter is left with no one to take care of them when their daughter is wed off.

it has been like... 20 years? since they implement the policy, and i'm very interested to know to what extent the impact has been to china, socially and economically.

is it a successful policy?
Reply With Quote
(#18 (permalink))
Old
burkhartdesu's Avatar
burkhartdesu (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 740
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alaska
Exclamation 02-08-2009, 06:33 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aniki View Post
Nope that wouldn't help either. If you'd check the the list of countries by birthrate you'll see that almost all countries in Africa are at the top of the list, so the US and England wouldn't help much to reduce the world's population or the resource problems.
To say that reducing the birthrate in America and England wouldn't help much to reduce the worlds resource problems is silly, and I know you secretly know that as well.

Considering America uses more oil than the rest of the world combined, I think we have a pretty big dent in good ol' mother nature.

And did you know that California now uses more oil than CHINA? Yes! China, the very country that sparked this ridiculous conversation.

California alone uses more gasoline than any country in the world (except the US as a whole, of course). That means California's 20 billion gallon gasoline and diesel habit is greater than China's! (Or Russia's. Or India's. Or Brazil's. Or Germany's.)

Here is a chart from a bp oil consumption statistics website

Note that both China and South Africa use the least oil.
And the funny thing is, America is so brainwashed by Christianity that they're trying to keep people from getting birth control and legal abortions..

Last edited by burkhartdesu : 02-08-2009 at 06:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
(#19 (permalink))
Old
Jaydelart's Avatar
Jaydelart (Offline)
ジェイデラート
 
Posts: 777
Join Date: Apr 2008
02-08-2009, 09:03 AM

Don't pounce on Christians too hard. In general, people don't like the loss of a life; I'm sure it's not just Christians that are disturbed by abortion.
I thought it necessary to clarify, lest an anti-Christian sentiment arose in this debate.


Let's try to keep things relatively respectful, especially when dealing with such a sensitive issue.

To set a more moderate tone, let me just add that I, as a Christian, in regard to abortion, wouldn't mind either way. Could that mean I'm not completely brainwashed?
Reply With Quote
(#20 (permalink))
Old
mrnicekid's Avatar
mrnicekid (Offline)
JF Regular
 
Posts: 54
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Akita City
02-08-2009, 09:51 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaydelart View Post
To set a more moderate tone, let me just add that I, as a Christian, in regard to abortion, wouldn't mind either way. Could that mean I'm not completely brainwashed?
Oh Lord! Have mercy on this one whose soul is not completely brainwashed... yet.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Copyright 2003-2006 Virtual Japan.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6