|
|||
My opinion. -
02-14-2009, 07:49 PM
Hi there!!!!
Well..This is a delicate subject.. I just wanted to express my opinion... I know the culture of the Asian world, Ive in in Japan a few times, and its ok to eat fish... I believe the problem is based on the fact of the amount of fish & Whales hunted... Its not like eating Cows or chickens, the are grown to be eaten and eating them has no impact in the today's polluted and wasted world. But...with the whale is different, it is not an unlimited resource and they only give birth to a child at a time. Last but not least, In don't think it be fair that only some countries in all the world fish and harvest and waste the Oceans that are property of all mankind. See it this way. ¿have you the right to exterminate the Whales, White Shark or other species?. I know your population has grown to fast. Congratulations to your great country, but you are putting far to much pressure on the seas. Lastly...I Will introduce myself. I am form Argentina, yes, yes, very far away form your nice country.....and...time to time one of your Killing machines appears hunting our resources , inside our territorial waters. We have a natural reserve for whales and we have polices that are letting the Franca Austral Whale to recover........ So...Why Our country of only 35M people really take care of not exterminate them and you came here to hunt them?. Its understandable that you government want to feed the people...but, At what cost? Wont be much fair If you just rise you own whales? Just my thoughts. Cheers! |
|
|||
02-14-2009, 07:57 PM
Quote:
The methods used are the only one available for them. And the rules are usually bend and interpretated, for that reason the wolrd is full of lawyers. In the past of some counties, people have been killed for smuggling drugs.... Others have come though difficult times with difficult desicions Others has dropped atomic bombs in your country and now make movies about the evil axis and their torture to the free world. Good and evil are just a point of view. Killing animals and extingiting them is wrong. |
|
||||
02-15-2009, 12:19 PM
Quote:
Australia recently ignored international law in the drawing up of Timor Leste's maritime borders. Borders which now give Australia a share in revenue over certain gas fields which would otherwise belong to Timor Leste. If we're going to condemn countries for violation of International law I'd easily condemn the United States or Australia over Japan. |
|
||||
02-16-2009, 09:25 AM
Quote:
I'm not excusing the Japanese government for what their actions but your angle of attack is not helpful. And I'm saying exploiting a loophole because that's what they're doing. It's not a euphimism of any sort. The whaling moratorium put into place the rule that commercial whale is prohibited BUT whaling may be carried out for research purposes and the by-product is allowed to be sold off. I agree that the Japanese are violating the spirit of such a law as their research is questionable. |
|
||||
02-16-2009, 07:55 PM
Quote:
However... I'm having some trouble with your argument. You mention lawyers... But if laws were bent and changed as usually as you describe, wouldn't that mean there is some chance to win in a legal battle? If so, physically harassing whalers is not the only method of option. People continue to compare this issue to war. In my opinion, it's a poor comparison. They are not the same thing. Wars are fought involving human lives; our own families are affected by it; virtually our entire species is affected by it. This allows for a completey different set of attitudes and actions to exist. Spoken bluntly, if World War 3 were to take place, the last thing I'd be worrying about is the poor whales. Killing whales, especially when it is, in some cases, being used to feed people, does not equal to war in scale. It is a significant matter, of course. But it's misleading to compare it to war, nevertheless. |
|
||||
02-17-2009, 10:04 AM
Quote:
Quote:
The problem is that the issue of whaling is just not that big. That and there is really no moral high ground we in the West could take concerning International law. We're not trying to destroy your argument. After all we're on the same side here. Just trying to refine it so that you can understand what the deal is. |
|
|||
02-18-2009, 09:41 AM
Place sanctions against Japan? I think you are very young as you appear to still have the innocence of youth. Believe me, sanctioning Japan is a lot harder than just saying it and the repercussions of such action, even if it were "do-able", I think you are totally unaware of. I applaud your convictions but I also think it might be a little indelicate to pursue this topic in the manner which you have on an (I love) Jananese forum but that is just my opinion and you are absolutely free to form your own however it does not hurt to consider alternative lines of thought. Good luck but your presentation needs a little refinement I think. Just out of interest I am anti whaling and the whole idea of my response is not to disagree with your content but the methods of your delivery. Have a nice day.
|
|
||||
02-18-2009, 12:02 PM
Quote:
They're hardly being extinct. The argument concerning extinction is that if commercial whaling was resumed... they could very likely come close to extinction again. Quote:
Japan aren't breaking any laws! You're clearly talking out of your ass. You have no grasp on the reality or the complexity of the situation. Everything to you is so black and white. I cringe to think that we're on the same side... because you do a poor job of representing it. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|