|
|||
05-30-2009, 01:26 AM
Even weirder pieces of news are started to show up. Inconclusive despite radiation can be measured in many ways distantly in today's technology? Interesting.
U.S. says North Korea test results "inconclusive" | Reuters WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Initial U.S. testing to determine whether North Korea fired a nuclear device on Monday proved "inconclusive," said a U.S. official on Friday. "The first test results came in inconclusive. They did not find anything that could confirm a nuclear device was detonated," said the U.S. official, who declined to be named. (Reporting by Sue Pleming) |
|
||||
05-30-2009, 06:18 AM
Quote:
|
|
|||
05-30-2009, 06:35 AM
Not that serious. Since when was North Korea serious about anything?
|
|
|||
05-30-2009, 06:59 AM
Quote:
Kim Jong Il and his military "conclave" endorses son #3 and what is the best way to guarantee this? Why of course, a very dubious nuclear weapon test and shooting several missiles to the sea. |
|
|||
05-30-2009, 07:08 AM
Just read kirakira's post, Ronin. The answers is there and I'm not surprised you ignored it. North Korea is not crazy to start a war and you know better.
Quote:
|
|
||||
05-30-2009, 07:11 AM
Quote:
Unless you think North Korea actually put a kiloton worth of explosives in the ground... or you think they have some sort of Earthquake machine that caused the richter scale to jump... Furthermore the "consolidation of power in order to transition leadership to his son" theory is but one of many. It might be right... but all theories should be taken into consideration. Including the theory which sees North Korea continuing it's nuclear testing because it believes the West is gutless to do anything about it (I think that's true) and because the only way North Korea can establish itself in the long term is via obtaining nukes. |
|
||||
05-30-2009, 07:21 AM
Quote:
Quote:
I read what kira had to say about me... (for the record I can speak Japanese... albeit only at an intermediate level as my JPLT level says.. and while I may not be an expert on the region... my opinions have not been addressed. Sinestra is quite right in pointing out that you failed to read what I was getting at. Appeasement is not an acceptable long term solution to me. THAT is why I would support military action IF it were decided to be taken. Since it seems evidently clear that this option will not be taken... let's move on shall we?) |
|
|||
05-30-2009, 07:24 AM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
05-30-2009, 07:31 AM
Quote:
Like you said before in PM: You want to say something then say it in the thread... I'm not replying to this. Goodbye How kind of you to be rude to someone~ Quote:
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|