Korea

[solemnclockwork]

Originally Posted by komitsuki

Like you said before to me: you could word it better.



I accept the bad side of North Korea and never comment about them. That's because I don't have any problems with them. I'm saying this more than once now. Drill it into your brain or don't comment it again.

I'm criticizing more than two countries equally: North Korea, South Korea, and USA.

You are circling your own arguments now. How pity of you. I suggest drop it.

umm, point out in this thread where you criticized North Korea comparable to both South and America.

That said, you still have eluded my questions pointed at you like you just eluded this one.

that article gives no sources for us to look up, so I'm going to ask you to provide more evidence to support that Ahn worked for the USA. That said in no way did the USA authorized him to assassinate kim Gu.

So are you going to answer my questions or try to "downgrade" me?

[komitsuki]

Originally Posted by solemnclockwork

That said, you still have eluded my questions pointed at you like you just eluded this one.

that article gives no sources for us to look up, so I'm going to ask you to provide more evidence to support that Ahn worked for the USA. That said in no way did the USA authorized him to assassinate kim Gu.

So are you going to answer my questions or try to "downgrade" me?

Can you read university level Korean? Note that machine translation is utterly terrible for Asian languages to English.

[solemnclockwork]

Originally Posted by komitsuki

Can you read university level Korean? Note that machine translation is utterly terrible for Asian languages to English.

why does that have anything to do with the current topic. Unless you trying to pull "the source is in another language" deal. You do know that if there are documents that relate to Ahn "working" for the US would be in English. No I can't either.

[komitsuki]

Originally Posted by solemnclockwork

why does that have anything to do with the current topic. Unless you trying to pull "the source is in another language" deal. You do know that if there are documents that relate to Ahn "working" for the US would be in English. No I can't either.

Because the original information about Ahn Du Hwi is published in the Korean language.

Remember. Korean-American history researchers are catered for the South Korean academia and audience, not for the American academia and audience. Can't read it? Don't think about it.

[solemnclockwork]

Originally Posted by komitsuki

Because the original information about Ahn Du Hwi is published in the Korean language.

Remember. Korean-American history researchers are catered for the South Korean academia and audience, not for the American academia and audience. Can't read it? Don't think about it.

Did you get the part about him "working" for the US government? I'm certain that if you could validate that it would be in English. I mean it certainly has to do with documents relating to him would be in English for our officials.

[komitsuki]

Originally Posted by solemnclockwork

Did you get the part about him "working" for the US government? I'm certain that if you could validate that it would be in English. I mean it certainly has to do with documents relating to him would be in English for our officials.

This news article in Korean http://www.munhwa.com/news/view.html...01013125040001

The problem is that the academic paper is indeed written first in Korean. Consider that Korean to Korean summarization is less of an error.

It says that Ahn Doo-Hwi was an American agent and the American writer who wrote the report of Kim Gu's assassination perfectly admitted that Ahn Doo-Hwi was an American agent. All in Korean.

[komitsuki]

What is more scary fact for a lot of people is that South Korea before the Korean War has unusually significant left wing or Communist activities.

This is very obvious consider how the union workers in South Korea still preserves this tradition before the Korean War. Not to mention the National Security Act (NSA).

[solemnclockwork]

Originally Posted by komitsuki

This news article in Korean http://www.munhwa.com/news/view.html...01013125040001

The problem is that the academic paper is indeed written first in Korean. Consider that Korean to Korean summarization is less of an error.

It says that Ahn Doo-Hwi was an American agent and the American writer who wrote the report of Kim Gu's assassination perfectly admitted that Ahn Doo-Hwi was an American agent. All in Korean.

What good does that do me, when I said I couldn't read Korean and I doubt a lot of people here can too. That said, give the name of the American writer you speak of. One thing strikes me though out of what you said here.

What position or authority does this writer have to "admit"?

[solemnclockwork]

Originally Posted by komitsuki

What is more scary fact for a lot of people is that South Korea before the Korean War has unusually significant left wing or Communist activities.

This is very obvious consider how the union workers in South Korea still preserves this tradition before the Korean War. Not to mention the National Security Act (NSA).

What point is it to post this? America had/has people who want an communist party.

[komitsuki]

Originally Posted by solemnclockwork

What good does that do me, when I said I couldn't read Korean and I doubt a lot of people here can too. That said, give the name of the American writer you speak of. One thing strikes me though out of what you said here.

What position or authority does this writer have to "admit"?

Major George E. Cilley, an American officer.