JapanForum.com  


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
(#81 (permalink))
Old
Tenchu's Avatar
Tenchu (Offline)
-
 
Posts: 997
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: -
08-17-2009, 10:00 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by noodle View Post
lol... I'll take that as a compliment (because of my handicap of course )
And no, I don't have a dull outlook on science. My way of thinking means that I always question things! Therefore, science never gets dull, because we can never truly know everything about science. The more questions you ask, the more answers you will find
I question things too, Noodle, but I usually eventually arrive at a conclusion.

You say you do here (get answers), but I'm not sure I believe you... just what questions asked have you ever actually answered?

Quote:
Originally Posted by iPhantom View Post
Only a dumbass would say shit is a creation of dog. It did not come from nothingness, it was just food transforming. IF you don't supply the food to the dog, he won't shit at all. See? There is no creation, just chemical reactions. This is what the theory that everything has existed says. It's a very solid one tbh, people always say everything needs a source while actually you can't find any real source. To understand this, you need some knowledge on chemistry.
I'm not the one who needs knowledge of chemistry. You still don't understand; nothing just magically exists oneday. It needs an explainable source.

If you want to continue this conversation, at least provide a link to your "everything has always existed forever" theory if you can't be fu**ed explaining it yourself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iPhantom View Post
Anyway, I already said my comment on your weird cycle elements. Fire is not an element, what you reading through classic science? We're in 2009 FFS.
How does how old my information is effect how true it is? At least my theory can be tried and tested and seen in everything... better than your "the dog shit on my lawn has always been there because I eat food" theory.

Anyway, your statement about Fire not being an element... I don't know where to start laughing...


The eternal Saint is calling, through the ages she has told. The ages have not listened; the will of faith has grown old…

For forever she will wander, for forever she withholds; the Demon King is on his way, you’d best not be learned untold…
(#82 (permalink))
Old
noodle's Avatar
noodle (Offline)
Wo zhi dao ni ai wo
 
Posts: 1,418
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Paris/London/Algiers
08-17-2009, 10:26 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenchu View Post
I question things too, Noodle, but I usually eventually arrive at a conclusion.

You say you do here (get answers), but I'm not sure I believe you... just what questions asked have you ever actually answered?
It depends what questions you're asking... Of course you will arrive at a conclusion when you ask simple quantifiable questions. I arrive at conclusions everyday. Whether I want to or not, for uni I have to arrive to a conclusion anyway!

And what are you talking about here? are you trying to talk about my questions of life, god and religion? The majority of questions I ask about these three, I still don't have a satisfactory answer. However, I do feel I am getting closer to answering them with what you call my disability, lol!

EDIT; I think what iPhantom is trying to say to you is The first law of thermodynamics! In a sense, he does have a point, according to that, what exists now couldn't have been created, just transformed!
(#83 (permalink))
Old
Ronin4hire's Avatar
Ronin4hire (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 2,353
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ウェリントン、ニュジランド
08-17-2009, 11:20 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by noodle View Post
lol... Do you even know what modern Science (Physics) is? Have you ever heard of Quantum Physics or even Quantum Mechanics? I study this at Uni! The only rational part of it all is the maths (and that's if you can get a grasp of it). And for the math to even be applied, you would have needed a HUUUUUUGE imagination to think of what is happening at such a small scale. You CANNOT see anything. You see certain effects from some random experiments, and you put your imagination to work to see what’s happening. Once you have an idea, you think up of tests to prove that your image of what is happening is in fact correct! So, I don’t really get why you’re being sarcastic when you don’t even know what Modern Physics is all about!
Even when studying it and are told what is happening, the majority of people that study this at Uni end up failing because they CANNOT imagine how it could be possible. You’re told to forget all the classical laws of physics. Newton is an idiot when it comes to anything Quantum!

And when did I say Science is all made up? Do you really think I would be wasting my time and money studying Math and Physics at University if I thought it was all made up? I LOVE these two subjects. I love the theories. AND I love that they’re not called facts and that anyone that actually studies these theories will tell you that accepting them as they are now means you’re just stupid! I’ve studied The Big Bang Theory in depth at uni! You probably don’t even know what the Doppler Effect is, do you? If you had any clue about the big bang theory and the Doppler Effect, you’d realise why it’s not conclusive. You could even prove this at a pond near you. Drop a big rock into the pond to show the actual big bang! Then drop another rock further out to show a star or galaxy blowing up… Then tell me what the waves look like and if you could really tell a lot about the big bang from it!

As for The Big Bang theory being more probable than creationism… how does that work? You do realise that they don’t go against each other right? That for example, the majority of religious people do believe in a BIG BANG! The main difference to a lot of people is; what was there before the actual Bang? Was it nothing that exploded, or was it a power that made everything explode? I’d like you to tell me how on earth you think science can prove something like that? Scientists can’t even prove that wind is real! According to the methods of science, you can’t prove it because we only see its effects, not its origin!

To be honest, I don’t even know why I’m talking to you about this. You say I’m not a scientist, but if someone isn’t a scientist when he studies science, then I wonder what you are! You don’t have a clue about the details of a theory (or even Science), yet you argue it!
Haha.. you're so trolling now. I mean you didn't even address my point. You came in and told me that

Quote:
All modern science(Physics) is NOT rational.
And now you've backtracked to say that you only meant Quantum Physics.
I don't really believe that you study Quantum physics to be honest as you don't really exude the sort of intelligence required... But whatever it's irrelevant. I'm well aware of the grand proposals based upon the mathematical gymnastics involved in the field. And you never specified Quantum physics.... you said all modern science.

Anyway not only did you backtrack... you said science was not rational. Yet the grand proposals made by Quantum physicists, while far-fetched... are actually rational and are hopefully one day testable. Perhaps you need to look up the meaning of rational in the dictionary (Yeah right! Quantum physicist my ass)

The Big Bang theory is more probable than creationism simply because creationism is improbable to the point where it's simply made up. There is NO evidence to back it up... just speculation based upon outdated and inconsistent literature. Not only that but the theory of creationism has many holes... the biggest one being of course.. who created the creator? In fact creationism is probably the only theory I've heard of that thrives on the lack of evidence!

And what do you mean scientists can't prove the wind is real! It's a testable phenomena which is observable and explainable.. I don't know how more "proven" you want wind to be!

Wait... let me guess.. you're going to tell me you're a meteorologist as a comeback...

Please!

Last edited by Ronin4hire : 08-17-2009 at 11:23 AM.
(#84 (permalink))
Old
Tenchu's Avatar
Tenchu (Offline)
-
 
Posts: 997
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: -
08-17-2009, 11:43 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by noodle View Post
And what are you talking about here? are you trying to talk about my questions of life, god and religion? The majority of questions I ask about these three, I still don't have a satisfactory answer. However, I do feel I am getting closer to answering them with what you call my disability, lol!
LOL

Trust a Muslim to think everything is about God and his religion!

I was reffering to your simple questions, Noodle, like "Where did I put my underwear?" and "Why does this food taste like someone peed in it?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by noodle View Post
EDIT; I think what iPhantom is trying to say to you is The first law of thermodynamics! In a sense, he does have a point, according to that, what exists now couldn't have been created, just transformed!
I know that; things are never destroyed, only recycled... well, this is everyone OUTSIDE of America, of course.

But that is how the current world works. We could recycle beer bottles until the buffalo comes home; it doesn't change that at some point in history, someone actually did make a first beer bottle out of... lets just say "nothing" for the point of my argument.

Each item is a recreation of particles from former items. But there must have been an initial item. A first, God like item... a heavenly beer... do you see my point?

Anyway, I'd like to raise an interesting question: if all shit now is only to be recycled, how is it going to end? How the universe will end seems even more difficult to think of than how it began.


The eternal Saint is calling, through the ages she has told. The ages have not listened; the will of faith has grown old…

For forever she will wander, for forever she withholds; the Demon King is on his way, you’d best not be learned untold…
(#85 (permalink))
Old
Tenchu's Avatar
Tenchu (Offline)
-
 
Posts: 997
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: -
08-17-2009, 11:52 AM

Firstly, for a laugh, a member with no posts who has no doubt also spammed your email box just sent me this:

Quote:
if u want war just go here in d philippines u had no ryts 2 tell fuck off 2me idiot.. ur showing dat in ur culture ur making foolishness im not joining in this forum 2 tell stupidness 2 me.. crazy! ur not punk! punyeta boz!
LOL

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin4hire View Post
Not only that but the theory of creationism has many holes... the biggest one being of course.. who created the creator? In fact creationism is probably the only theory I've heard of that thrives on the lack of evidence!
Nice to see you havn't read any of my posts. I already explained how the "creator" (which I don't view as a concious being) is way beyond your tiny 30 year old grasp.

Anyway, saying "Who created the creator?" to discard creationism is pretty silly. I mean, if there's no creator at all, what created existence?

Frankly, Noodles idea seems less complex than yours. I mean, at least he has a theory as to where all this shit came from, even if an old man had to sleep with a little girl to get it!


The eternal Saint is calling, through the ages she has told. The ages have not listened; the will of faith has grown old…

For forever she will wander, for forever she withholds; the Demon King is on his way, you’d best not be learned untold…
(#86 (permalink))
Old
Ronin4hire's Avatar
Ronin4hire (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 2,353
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ウェリントン、ニュジランド
08-17-2009, 12:19 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenchu View Post

Nice to see you havn't read any of my posts. I already explained how the "creator" (which I don't view as a concious being) is way beyond your tiny 30 year old grasp.

Anyway, saying "Who created the creator?" to discard creationism is pretty silly. I mean, if there's no creator at all, what created existence?

Frankly, Noodles idea seems less complex than yours. I mean, at least he has a theory as to where all this shit came from, even if an old man had to sleep with a little girl to get it!
What sort of argument is that? "The creator is way beyond your tiny 30 year old grasp" Wait but let me guess... it's not beyond yours?

Furthermore you realise that your phrasing of a question as a comeback to my post just shows your feeble language skills more than anything.

"If there's no creator at all, what created existence?" You've already made the assumption that existence was created! Do I really have to explain to you the possiblity that existence wasn't created at all? Perhaps it happened by accident? Perhaps it never had a beginning?

And finally you make the claim that ANY old theory is better than having no theory at all? How do I come back to such idiocy!
(#87 (permalink))
Old
iPhantom's Avatar
iPhantom (Offline)
is a pretty cool guy
 
Posts: 1,206
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Europe
Send a message via AIM to iPhantom Send a message via MSN to iPhantom Send a message via Skype™ to iPhantom
08-17-2009, 12:40 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenchu View Post
I'm not the one who needs knowledge of chemistry. You still don't understand; nothing just magically exists oneday. It needs an explainable source.

If you want to continue this conversation, at least provide a link to your "everything has always existed forever" theory if you can't be fu**ed explaining it yourself.
It seems you never had chemistry in your life. You learn it right there in school "nothing is created, nothing is destroyed everything is transformed' for every reaction or anything that has changed in the human history. There are some people like you that try to put some random arguments that everything needs a source while you have nothing to base this on. Isn't that naive?

Oh and the link: Big Bounce - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia <-- It's a better version of the Big Bang which specifically says that Big Bang wasn't the start but is something which has happened in earlier universes and will happen again. Much more believable than the Big Bang theory which says it was the real start.

Quote:
How does how old my information is effect how true it is? At least my theory can be tried and tested and seen in everything... better than your "the dog shit on my lawn has always been there because I eat food" theory.

Anyway, your statement about Fire not being an element... I don't know where to start laughing...
Your theory was used during ancient times. Modern science doesn't call fire and element. Go learn what chemical reaction causes fire instead of bringing up fallacies like this.

Here: Astrology and the classical elements - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Those are your elements, and it's astrology. Do you know what modern science thinks about this rubbish?



Quote:
Since when is it immature to talk about pudding? Seriously, do you know the meaning of mature?
(#88 (permalink))
Old
Tenchu's Avatar
Tenchu (Offline)
-
 
Posts: 997
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: -
08-17-2009, 12:45 PM

INTERNETWARS!!! Kick ass!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin4hire View Post
What sort of argument is that? "The creator is way beyond your tiny 30 year old grasp" Wait but let me guess... it's not beyond yours?
No. It is beyond mine.

Ronin, how are we supposed to understand everything? We've only just turned from monkeys into machine makers almost last night, it seems. You think the evolution process has finished, and you're the direct end result and purpose of 4 billion years of evolution and all beings that exist forever after you will be either your equals or lesser, but none more advanced?

As far as I'm concerned, we're all still as good as monkeys, anyway. So no, I don't have faith that we can understand perfectly something that has no physical form whatsoever and can create a blast so powerful it could both create and destroy everything we know. Especially when I simply having trouble creating enough power to simply make a boxing-bag move.

I think you're a little naive, Ronin.

If evolution continues ("if" is implying that we'll probably destroy the world first and everything will finish), oneday you're going to look as pathetic to the future beings as banana throwing monkeys look to us today.

And yes, I don't know your age, but I'm guessing it's anywhere from 5 - 30 (having trouble chosing whether I should pay more attention to your avatar or your personality to guess your age). You think that if God did exist, you'd have managed to conjure enough wisdom in these small few years to be able to surely comment on where the fuck he came from?

I don't believe in God, Ronin. It's not because all religous folk I've met are insecure retards, it's just because the way they describe him as a concious and almost human like being seems pretty fucking childish to me. But that doesn't mean I'm naive enough to assume there's no force out there that cannot exist independant of existence.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin4hire View Post
Furthermore you realise that your phrasing of a question as a comeback to my post just shows your feeble language skills more than anything.
Better than being the one on the back foot playing hostile-defensive in every post slamming the mouse down violently with every line read...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin4hire View Post
"If there's no creator at all, what created existence?" You've already made the assumption that existence was created! Do I really have to explain to you the possiblity that existence wasn't created at all? Perhaps it happened by accident? Perhaps it never had a beginning?
So, first you say God must have a creator, then you say dirt could have existed forever anyway... I love your "logic"...

I guess this is just one of them things that is beyond you; yes, Ronin, I know for a fact that all things in existence today have a moment of creation where, at the moment before they were created, no other physical thing existed in which they could have been made from.

Call it a womens intuition, but I'm not naive enough to believe just because something can be recycled, that it's always been recycled. That's a cute as a belief like MissMisa had thinking the universe goes on forever...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin4hire View Post
And finally you make the claim that ANY old theory is better than having no theory at all? How do I come back to such idiocy!
It's not any old theory. It's a darn creative one. You pound a six year old between the legs every night and see what philosophy you come up with!


The eternal Saint is calling, through the ages she has told. The ages have not listened; the will of faith has grown old…

For forever she will wander, for forever she withholds; the Demon King is on his way, you’d best not be learned untold…
(#89 (permalink))
Old
Tenchu's Avatar
Tenchu (Offline)
-
 
Posts: 997
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: -
08-17-2009, 12:47 PM

iPhantom, you're clearly not following this thread too well, so I'll give you a moment to catch up before I reply.

Gotta wait for these slower ones...


The eternal Saint is calling, through the ages she has told. The ages have not listened; the will of faith has grown old…

For forever she will wander, for forever she withholds; the Demon King is on his way, you’d best not be learned untold…

Last edited by Tenchu : 08-17-2009 at 12:52 PM.
(#90 (permalink))
Old
Ronin4hire's Avatar
Ronin4hire (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 2,353
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ウェリントン、ニュジランド
08-17-2009, 01:02 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenchu View Post
INTERNETWARS!!! Kick ass!

No. It is beyond mine.

Ronin, how are we supposed to understand everything? We've only just turned from monkeys into machine makers almost last night, it seems. You think the evolution process has finished, and you're the direct end result and purpose of 4 billion years of evolution and all beings that exist forever after you will be either your equals or lesser, but none more advanced?

As far as I'm concerned, we're all still as good as monkeys, anyway. So no, I don't have faith that we can understand perfectly something that has no physical form whatsoever and can create a blast so powerful it could both create and destroy everything we know. Especially when I simply having trouble creating enough power to simply make a boxing-bag move.

I think you're a little naive, Ronin.

If evolution continues ("if" is implying that we'll probably destroy the world first and everything will finish), oneday you're going to look as pathetic to the future beings as banana throwing monkeys look to us today.

And yes, I don't know your age, but I'm guessing it's anywhere from 5 - 30 (having trouble chosing whether I should pay more attention to your avatar or your personality to guess your age). You think that if God did exist, you'd have managed to conjure enough wisdom in these small few years to be able to surely comment on where the fuck he came from?

I don't believe in God, Ronin. It's not because all religous folk I've met are insecure retards, it's just because the way they describe him as a concious and almost human like being seems pretty fucking childish to me. But that doesn't mean I'm naive enough to assume there's no force out there that cannot exist independant of existence.
I'm sorry... what!? All I got from that rabble is that I'm apparently naive because I don't believe in a creator.

OK... I'm naive to not believe in something that has no evidence of existence. You're real smart there Tenchu.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenchu View Post
Better than being the one on the back foot playing hostile-defensive in every post slamming the mouse down violently with every line read...

So, first you say God must have a creator, then you say dirt could have existed forever anyway... I love your "logic"...

I guess this is just one of them things that is beyond you; yes, Ronin, I know for a fact that all things in existence today have a moment of creation where, at the moment before they were created, no other physical thing existed in which they could have been made from.

Call it a womens intuition, but I'm not naive enough to believe just because something can be recycled, that it's always been recycled. That's a cute as a belief like MissMisa had thinking the universe goes on forever...
Wow... not only were you not able to comprehend any of the points I was making.. but you got confused by them and formulated a comeback that really makes no sense whatsoever.

I mean I can see where you went wrong... at least concerning your misunderstanding of my criticism of the creationist "first cause" argument.

I
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenchu View Post
t's not any old theory. It's a darn creative one. You pound a six year old between the legs every night and see what philosophy you come up with!
Is that a lame attempt at a joke? I mean it can't disguise the fact that I was right and you were wrong concerning this point.... just making sure you know that.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Copyright 2003-2006 Virtual Japan.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6