JapanForum.com  


View Poll Results: Should the US president be allowed to give a message directly to America's students
Yes 76 76.77%
No 23 23.23%
Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
(#211 (permalink))
Old
MMM's Avatar
MMM (Offline)
JF Ossan
 
Posts: 12,200
Join Date: Jun 2007
09-12-2009, 01:25 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai007 View Post
Than you weren't really paying attention.

Gen. Petraeus was called "General Betray us".

Murtha said that US marines at Haditha murdered civilians in cold blood, when in fact they were exonerated of all charges.

Sen. John Kerry told Bob Schieffer on CBS' "Face the Nation" that "there is no reason that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women . . . ." This was a more modest reprise of his post-Vietnam charges that U.S. troops had raped, tortured and pillaged in the tradition of Genghis Khan.

Ted Kennedy said "Saddam's torture chamber has reopened under new management."

Dick Durbin exclaimed that "describing what Americans had done to prisoners under our control, you would most certainly believe this must have been done by the Nazis, Soviets in their gulags or some mad regime — Pol Pot or others — that had no concern for human beings."

Do you really think calling out troops cold-blooded murderers who terrorize women and children in the night, and act like the Nazis, Soviets, or Pol Pot, is supporting our troops or offering constructive criticism on how to win the war? HELL NO! These damaging lies and insinuations were outright attacks on the troops' and the country's morale. And they were done because they wanted Bush to fail, even if it also meant the country failing and troops dying. Remember Columbia professor De Genova calling for "a million Mogadishus" and saying "The only true heroes are those who find ways that help defeat the U.S. military"? The words and actions of a great many Dems, both in Congress and marching in protests, showed they agreed with those sentiments at some level.

"A million Mogadishus" - Salon.com
I didn't say there wasn't criticism, I said no one has come out and said they wanted President Bush to fail and for America to lose the war. General Betray Us was an ad taken out by a political action group.

And I am not going to go charge by charge, but I don't think you can deny some reprehensible acts have taken place under our watch, from Abu Garib prisoner torture to water boarding, to individual cases of rape and murder. Steven Green was just sentenced to life in prison last week for raping a14-year-old and murdering her family.

Naturally single cases don't tell the whole story and are thankfully the extreme minority, but that doesn't mean people shouldn't be able to talk about it in the proper context.

Talking about these things and saying we want the troops to come home is not the same as saying I want to president to fail or I hope America loses the war(s).
Reply With Quote
(#212 (permalink))
Old
clintjm's Avatar
clintjm (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 402
Join Date: Aug 2009
09-12-2009, 01:45 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post

This guy talks like this for three or four hours a day, then turn off the mic, light up a cigar and watch Beck and Hannity and all the other cable pundits do it all night.
This is bad? Thats sounds like he is doing his job.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post

My point is, there is an industry of people that get paid a lot of good money to tear the president apart for several hours a day. They don't have to fact check or show any responsibility, because they are not "journalists". The problem is there are people that 1) trust them and
Its not just the president, its the government in general.
To not have a check in your government officials only leads to ruin.

"The Problem(s)" as you put can also be said for government and up to the highest office. 1) Blind Trust 2) Hang on every word.

Of course they have to have fact checks... this is how they stay on the air. They have to have responsibility or they will lose face. This is why people listen. They present what they believe to be the facts for the information that can be backed up.

How else did Van Jones get canned? This is why the people stood up to the recent government spending of buying over half a billion on new jets while scolding others for not flying commercial.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post

2) hang on their every word. Rush Limbaugh cannot possibly believe all the lies that come out of his mouth, but the problem is there are people that do.
Its a fact that presidents and governments have lied before.
Corruption will always exist.

With this line of thinking you might as shut down the internet of any type public communication.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post
What it does is slowly create a culture where elected and respected officials will yell things at the president while he is speaking.
That has to be one of the most ridiculous views I've seen in a while.
Do you really think that a talk show host made Joe Wilson yell "you lie" at an inappropriate time?

Do you really believe the majority of people are being brained washed by talk show hosts and can't decide for themselves based on what they believe to be true? You don't believe anyone does a fact check on what they hear or read in such a forum?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post
One person I was talking to recently said she has lost respect for the office of the president, she hated Obama so much. It's one thing to not like the man, but to go so far as to no longer respect the office of president is a fantastic leap in common sense. I think another example is the topic of this thread.
Did you bother to ask the person you were talking to why she hated Obama so much? Its seems odd that you think because one can lose the respect for the office of the president is lack of common sense. There are many reasons why one could with any of the most recent presidents. Because of the promises and track record of the current president one could lose respect. To think this is a lack of common sense is nonsense.

Thanks to the freedoms allowed in America, we can. I think these shows make us think for ourselves and get the real facts.

If people blindly listen to these hosts or government without their own fact checks or thinking for themselves, then they are fools.

(Rush doesn't smoke anymore and that the golden EIB mic).
Okay now I'm just pushing buttons.. He does come off as a vain guy, but thats his gig. No one should believe what
Reply With Quote
(#213 (permalink))
Old
Sinestra's Avatar
Sinestra (Offline)
ショ ン
 
Posts: 612
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Where ever Miyuki Sawashiro is
Send a message via AIM to Sinestra Send a message via Yahoo to Sinestra
09-12-2009, 02:27 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by samurai007 View Post
Since 98% of black voters voted for Obama, it's not a stretch to say "Oh, you're black, you must be an Obama supporter." It was racist of many black voters that looked only at skin color and voted on that basis alone, IMO. If 98% of whites voted for McCain, you'd DEFINITELY hear about how racist that is, how whites obviously voted based on skin color alone, and that it was shameful. And rightfully so. So why are we supposed to pretend otherwise when 98% of black voters voted against the white guy?
Samurai i have black friends who did not vote for Obama yes they preferred MacCain. I still wouldn't walk up to some and judge them by their skin color on something that happen. I know how it feels to be stereotyped because of skin color i would never do it to another. There are blacks who voted for him because of his skin color and did not care about what he had to say, yes some black people thought yes it finally our turn and voted but not every black person was like that. I am not above voting across party lines if i like the other guy. I dont want to be stereotyped and i gave the guy an example later of how it feels to be stereotyped an lets just say he wouldnt look me in the eye for the rest of the day.

Hes proud of his long lineage which happens to have strong roots in the south and the midwest i remember because he talked about how big his family was and we got to talking family history one day. I told him his ancestors must have been slave owners and probably shot at native Americans after all your white and your family hails from the south. He got a sense of what it felt like after i said that. I do see your point but i dont like being stereotyped because of my race.


Reply With Quote
(#214 (permalink))
Old
Ryzorian (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,126
Join Date: Jun 2009
09-12-2009, 02:39 AM

Yea, Just cause I'm a white guy, doesn't mean I want to take over somebody's country all the time. It's useually between Monday and Wensday on alternate weeks.
Reply With Quote
(#215 (permalink))
Old
tksensei (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 189
Join Date: Aug 2009
09-12-2009, 03:13 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post
None of the Americans I know were upset by it. Conservative outcry.

Is that a scientific method? And, are you talking about Albanian conservatives then? Obama's been losing independents on this and other issues at an alarming rate.
Reply With Quote
(#216 (permalink))
Old
MMM's Avatar
MMM (Offline)
JF Ossan
 
Posts: 12,200
Join Date: Jun 2007
09-12-2009, 03:29 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by clintjm View Post
This is bad? Thats sounds like he is doing his job.
He is doing his job. And he can sleep at night...something I would not be able to do if I were him.

Quote:
Originally Posted by clintjm View Post
Its not just the president, its the government in general.
To not have a check in your government officials only leads to ruin.

"The Problem(s)" as you put can also be said for government and up to the highest office. 1) Blind Trust 2) Hang on every word.
I agree with you. But on the other hand Blind Mistrust and Condemning every word can not only be just as bad, it can be worse.

LIMBAUGH: He is lying, President Obama is, from the moment he opens his mouth until he ends the speech.

LIMBAUGH: If you want to talk about demeaning the chamber, the president of the United States demeaned the chamber last night. He showed up and lied through his teeth. He was petulant, he was mean-spirited, he was angry, he was arrogant, conceited, condescending, but more than anything else, he lied through his teeth. And everybody knows it.

This in not investigative language, this is divisive language. There is no fact checking and counter-pointing. It is just sweeping accusations...not even accusations. These are sweeping statements based on nothing but Rush Limbaugh's desire to get payed. He is the Insane Clown Posse of right-wing punditry, though he is more successful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by clintjm View Post
Of course they have to have fact checks... this is how they stay on the air. They have to have responsibility or they will lose face. This is why people listen. They present what they believe to be the facts for the information that can be backed up.

How else did Van Jones get canned? This is why the people stood up to the recent government spending of buying over half a billion on new jets while scolding others for not flying commercial.
I noticed you didn't address any of the quotes I put up from Rush Limbaugh. Those statements are not fact-checked and are not factual.

I agree that investigative reporting is essential and government corruption should be exposed and broadcast. I will keep my opinions of Van Jones to myself, but his idiocy was exposed and he was forced to go. That is the right thing to have happen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by clintjm View Post

Its a fact that presidents and governments have lied before.
Corruption will always exist.
And it government and presidents will lie again. That's not my point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by clintjm View Post
With this line of thinking you might as shut down the internet of any type public communication.
You said With this line of thinking you might as shut down the internet of any type public communication.

Where that came from I have no idea. Taking the idea that non-journalistic broadcasters should take responsibility for their words and turning that into "shut down the Internet" is a slippery slope on a hill I was no where near.

Quote:
Originally Posted by clintjm View Post
That has to be one of the most ridiculous views I've seen in a while.
Do you really think that a talk show host made Joe Wilson yell "you lie" at an inappropriate time?

Do you really believe the majority of people are being brained washed by talk show hosts and can't decide for themselves based on what they believe to be true? You don't believe anyone does a fact check on what they hear or read in such a forum?
I don't think it is ridiculous. People like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly have worked for many hours a day to help create a culture where disrespecting not just the man, but the office of the president is not only OK and normal, but is patriotic. And not only the president, but all elected officials.

To broadcast that the president wants to tear apart the Constitution with such fervor...is there no responsibility? I don't know how many times he has said it, but it was more than once on Thursday...I would be surprised to hear that is the first time.


Quote:
Originally Posted by clintjm View Post
Did you bother to ask the person you were talking to why she hated Obama so much? Its seems odd that you think because one can lose the respect for the office of the president is lack of common sense. There are many reasons why one could with any of the most recent presidents. Because of the promises and track record of the current president one could lose respect. To think this is a lack of common sense is nonsense.
Of course I did. I signed a petition on Facebook which led to several people attacking me. She was one of them. When I asked the question suddenly she was tired and needed to go to bed (there were other questions I had she couldn't answer). There are corrupt police. Does that mean all police shouldn't be trusted? Some coaches and teachers molest their students. Does that mean all teachers and coaches are not trustworthy? Some troops in Iraq have committed crimes...does that mean we shouldn't support our troops?


Quote:
Originally Posted by clintjm View Post
Thanks to the freedoms allowed in America, we can. I think these shows make us think for ourselves and get the real facts.

If people blindly listen to these hosts or government without their own fact checks or thinking for themselves, then they are fools.

(Rush doesn't smoke anymore and that the golden EIB mic).
Okay now I'm just pushing buttons.. He does come off as a vain guy, but thats his gig. No one should believe what
You think Rush Limbaugh gives you the real facts? These are all political entertainment shows. I agree with you, people need to search for the facts on their own. Unfortunately the vast majority of people don't do that. Is that Rush's fault? No, of course not. But if they did he would probably be out of a job.

Last edited by MMM : 09-12-2009 at 03:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
(#217 (permalink))
Old
MMM's Avatar
MMM (Offline)
JF Ossan
 
Posts: 12,200
Join Date: Jun 2007
09-12-2009, 03:31 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by tksensei View Post
Is that a scientific method? And, are you talking about Albanian conservatives then? Obama's been losing independents on this and other issues at an alarming rate.
Did I say it was scientific? None of the independents I know were ever behind Obama...but again, not scientific.
Reply With Quote
(#218 (permalink))
Old
Yuna7780's Avatar
Yuna7780 (Offline)
I'm Missh Yuna! ♥
 
Posts: 1,168
Join Date: Aug 2007
09-12-2009, 03:34 AM

No, because I have the choice to not watch it and I know there would probably be in school consequences if I refuse to watch it. I don't want to be forced to do something I don't want to do that I highly oppose. Why should I suffer consequences for refusing to watch a message from our president? He does not and SHOULD NOT control the media in my direction for something I can't "flip the channel" on.



Quote:
Originally Posted by tksensei View Post
This is Mao type shit folks, and they were hoping to slide it by before anyone thought about it too much. Fortunately, we still live in a country where public officials are watched and taken to task by responsible citizens.
lol. I was thinking about Mao when I first heard about this. I'm not saying Obama is Mao, but it was the first thing that came to my mind.


Thanks for reading!
~Yuna7780
Reply With Quote
(#219 (permalink))
Old
MMM's Avatar
MMM (Offline)
JF Ossan
 
Posts: 12,200
Join Date: Jun 2007
09-12-2009, 03:43 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuna7780 View Post
No, because I have the choice to not watch it and I know there would probably be in school consequences if I refuse to watch it. I don't want to be forced to do something I don't want to do that I highly oppose. Why should I suffer consequences for refusing to watch a message from our president? He does not and SHOULD NOT control the media in my direction for something I can't "flip the channel" on.
I don't want to be forced to do things I don't want to do on a daily basis. Unfortunately that is often a part of life.

But on the other hand I have not heard of any school actually forcing students to watch the president's speech against their will. Was this the case at your school?

But I would ask you, are you not supposed to listen to your teacher? Your coach? Your principal? Listening to people that have responsibility and control over your life is a part of life. Did you not want to listen simply because you had a choice, or was there another reason?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuna7780 View Post

lol. I was thinking about Mao when I first heard about this. I'm not saying Obama is Mao, but it was the first thing that came to my mind.
Someone else wasn't able to answer this question, so I hope you can. What about President Obama speaking to encourage American school children reminds you of Chairman Mao?
Reply With Quote
(#220 (permalink))
Old
tksensei (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 189
Join Date: Aug 2009
09-12-2009, 04:24 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post
Someone else wasn't able to answer this question, so I hope you can. What about President Obama speaking to encourage American school children reminds you of Chairman Mao?



Other than the cult of personality? Controling the population by making them subsverient to the state as personified by a charismatic leader? Indoctrinating children in service to the state rather than responsible exercise of their personal rights? The only thing missing is the blue suits and bad architecture.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Copyright 2003-2006 Virtual Japan.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6