|
|||
09-11-2009, 11:18 AM
indeed but bullshit also flows both ways.
swallowing someone else's bullshit does not make you any less an idiot, which i do believe is the whole point of this thread no? |
|
||||
09-11-2009, 03:01 PM
Oh FFS... You're all guilty of emotionally spinning history.
What happened happened... any spin you put on it is just that. And any comparisons you make are going to be to suit your own agendas. Thread over. |
|
||||
09-11-2009, 11:18 PM
Quote:
Truth is and this is a fact: Russia defeated a larger and more advanced part of Nazi (google for 'Waffen SS'). Also, Germany had around 80% of the concentration on the eastern front. In other words, Russia was the main guy out there, others were just 'assisting'. Seriously, what did USA do? Can you tell me how many US soldiers died? They all make it pretty dramatic in movies etc. but compared to US, Russia was in a freaking nightmare. Soviet Union - 10,700,000 USA - 416,800 The Battle of Stalingrad was the main factor of defining how the war would end. Quote:
|
|
||||
09-11-2009, 11:44 PM
"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country. " - George S. Patton
Quote:
We won on the western front by expending our technology, material, not our best resource, our people. |
|
||||
09-12-2009, 12:41 AM
Quote:
Quote:
But you still prove nothing. I never said USA lost. Allies won. But the main contributor was Russia. Get over it. If Germany had sent the same amount of troops (also the best) in Wester front (in other words if it was the other way it happened), Normandy would have been a large failure for USA. And Russia would have gained on the eastern side easily, also a lot less deaths. Quote:
|
|
||||
09-12-2009, 01:29 AM
Quote:
The Soviet Soldiers had little choice but to push ahead and fight the Germans, their officers kept machine guns pointed at them. If the Soviet Soldiers didn't keep up their attacks on the Germans, they risked being shot by their own officers. Do you know why fewer US soldiers died? Because they were free men with rights, equal to those of their commanders. As such, they were treated and cared for as well as possible, properly fed, properly armed, and used with care. Do you know why so many Soviet Soldiers died? Because they were peasants, expendable fodder considered less valuable than the weapons they carried. Many of them starved because they weren't properly fed, or died of disease because they weren't properly treated, or were killed in combat because they had no weapons to fight with. In big infantry assaults there were large numbers of unarmed Soviet Soldiers, as there were not enough guns to go around. And for those few guns, there were even less bullets. These unarmed soldiers had no choice but to attack, if they didn't they would be killed by their own commanders. |
|
|||
09-12-2009, 02:10 AM
Let's not forget that those same peasants had to charge German guns unarmed because the "Soviet" Officers would shoot them if they didn't.
Russia suffered mightly this is true, but most of it was caused by themselves. I was a 12Bravo hooked up with a M1A1 tank company in the 8th division in 91. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|