|
|||
10-05-2009, 03:32 AM
if she is so stupid as to try and post pot then she has no business teaching anyone really, regardless of what the pot was used for. it might as well have been nutmeg into certain countries that outlaw nutmeg in certain quantities.
werent teachers meant to teach you how to, at the very least, do some research? |
|
|||
10-07-2009, 12:44 AM
this is getting away from the stupid teacher topic, but a big part of japan's anti pot thing and its whole pot being a gateway drug thing is very similar to the west's attitudes in say the 50's. its not just about pot etc, but about quite a few things.
but then that might be because people who grew up in the 50's are now such a big part of the community that every thing caters to, that the attitudes still exist. but had this story taken place elsewhere, like say america, i believe the outrage would have been the same. having said that, drugs are more widespread here than the media would have you believe, theyre much more expensive, but theyre there,..... and as they say, the more the old people make something wrong, the more fun it is to do. |
|
||||
10-07-2009, 06:44 AM
The question isn`t whether the law is justified or not. It`s that it is a very obvious law (not something they just didn`t know about) - it was complete common sense. They broke the law in a foreign country when they most definitely should have known better. These people should have been able to live without for the length of their contract - I mean, it isn`t physically addictive right? They were stupid to break the law in a foreign country - that is all that matters.
If the law were something that you could simply not know about or forget about by habit - like the Time magazine example - I could excuse them in a way for breaking it. But this is in a completely different category - there is no room for excuses. They knowingly broke the law in a country known for VERY strongly enforcing that law. The law itself does not matter in this case. |
|
||||
10-07-2009, 01:07 PM
Quote:
|
|
||||
10-08-2009, 12:22 AM
Quote:
Quote:
This is flawed. If they relaxed on it, why would it make regulating more difficult? After all, they are relaxed. Legalizing it would eliminate the illegal trade -- considering it wouldn't be illegal. Look through-out History, prohibition never works. Quote:
Despite everything I've said, this surely sums it up |
|
||||
10-08-2009, 02:32 AM
Quote:
Prohibition is working in Japan, and it is working admirably. Japan doesn't have heroin or crack addicts selling their bodies so they can get enough money for another fix or hit. The jails are not full of dealers and other drug violators, and thousands of people aren't being killed here every year in gang wars. Japan doesn't give offenders a slap on the wrist, then turn them free to break more laws. Offenders are seriously punished, their names are published, and they are scorned. BTW, the picture you posted shows an Edo-period Japanese woman holding a tobacco pipe. |
|
||||
10-08-2009, 03:31 AM
Quote:
I don't have world statistics, but I would think that Japan's drug policy could be considered on the more successful side. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|