JapanForum.com  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
(#81 (permalink))
Old
burkhartdesu's Avatar
burkhartdesu (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 740
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alaska
11-20-2009, 07:46 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyororin View Post
I still take issue with the 100% harmless stance.

Not a direct cause of death does NOT mean totally harmless. There are tons of things in the world that may not directly kill you, but which are still not harmless. Death is certainly not the only definition of "harm".

If someone wants to bring up World of Warcraft as an example of something more harmful than marijuana, I have to shake my head. WOW certainly isn`t directly causing anyone`s death either - just like marijuana doesn`t. What killed the WOW players was not the game, but exhaustion. I am completely sure that no one has "World of Warcraft" or "video games" listed as their cause of death.

But that still doesn`t mean there isn`t a potential to be harmful to that person`s life.

I agree that there is no real reason for it to be illegal. I will never say it is \harmless or that it is not at all addictive.

This is what I'm saying as well, but I feel like you think I'm saying something different. Nothing is "100% harmless"... not sure anyone said that it was totally harmless. (I've frequently said it's a 'victimless crime', but 100% harmless, no.)

Anything is potential dangerous, addictive, and could lead to someones death; but this does not merit its complete prohibition (especially when the benefits may out way the risks).

Last edited by burkhartdesu : 11-20-2009 at 07:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
(#82 (permalink))
Old
Nyororin's Avatar
Nyororin (Offline)
Mod Extraordinaire
 
Posts: 4,147
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: あま市
Send a message via MSN to Nyororin Send a message via Yahoo to Nyororin
11-20-2009, 07:49 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by burkhartdesu View Post
This is what I'm saying as well, but I feel like you think I'm saying something different. Nothing is 100% harmless. Anything is potential dangerous, addictive, and could lead to someones death, but this does not merit its complete prohibition.
I wasn`t replying to you with that post. It was a reply to xyzone.

Anyway though - I support legalization, but I find it a bit hard to support someone when they say that it never harms anyone.


If anyone is trying to find me… Tamyuun on Instagram is probably the easiest.
Reply With Quote
(#83 (permalink))
Old
burkhartdesu's Avatar
burkhartdesu (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 740
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alaska
11-20-2009, 08:02 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyororin View Post
I wasn`t replying to you with that post. It was a reply to xyzone.

Anyway though - I support legalization, but I find it a bit hard to support someone when they say that it never harms anyone.

I've seen people in all walks of life who have let addiction ruin their lives.

Addiction is tragic, but education is key.


There's actually a anti-pot commercial by the Partnership for a Drug Free America that says something to the effect of:


"I smoked weed and nobody died.
I didn't get into a car accident, I didn't O.D. on heroin the next day, nothing happened.

(Shot widens to show the guy with two friends sitting on the couch)

We sat on Pete's couch for 11 hours.
Now what's going to happen on Pete's couch? Nothing.

(Shot now shows the guys on the couch in the middle of the woods with some mountain bikers riding by. Then to a basketball court. Then an ice rink.)

You have a better shot of dying out there in the real world, driving hard to the rim, ice skating with a girl. No, you wanna keep yourself alive, go over to Pete's and sit on his couch til you're 86.
Safest thing in the world. "


YouTube - Pete's Couch


Which I find to be slightly more honest, but unrealitic and hilarious since a lot of smokers I know are avid "outdoorsman" (could just be the Alaskan lifestyle)

Is this [commercial] sarcasm, or are they really acknowledging the lack of risks associated with it? They know kids are more educated these days, I suppose.

Last edited by burkhartdesu : 11-20-2009 at 08:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
(#84 (permalink))
Old
trunker (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 200
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nagasaki
11-20-2009, 11:07 AM

lol hilarious!

the "adults" who made that commercial obviously have no clue who their kids are.
Reply With Quote
(#85 (permalink))
Old
bELyVIS's Avatar
bELyVIS (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 682
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
11-21-2009, 01:37 AM

Life kills you every time. Might as well enjoy it.


The World's only Belly Dancing Elvis Impersonator!
Reply With Quote
(#86 (permalink))
Old
darksyndrem (Offline)
Banned
 
Posts: 1,048
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SC, USA
Send a message via MSN to darksyndrem
11-21-2009, 02:48 AM

Burkhartdesu, you left off probably the most important line of the commercial, "Me, I'll take my chances out there. Call me reckless."

I think this commercial is trying to tell the smokers, "Hey, this might not be doing anything bad to you, but there's something a lot better that you could be having" kind of thing. Hope that made sense...
Reply With Quote
(#87 (permalink))
Old
burkhartdesu's Avatar
burkhartdesu (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 740
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alaska
11-23-2009, 01:11 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by darksyndrem View Post
Burkhartdesu, you left off probably the most important line of the commercial, "Me, I'll take my chances out there. Call me reckless."

I think this commercial is trying to tell the smokers, "Hey, this might not be doing anything bad to you, but there's something a lot better that you could be having" kind of thing. Hope that made sense...

But like I said, most of the recreational smokers I know are avid sportsman.

But teenagers, sure... they should be out playing sports and living life


And in other news, a relatively new law was proposed to the U.S. Congress:


Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act of 2009
- Prohibits the imposition of any penalty under an Act of Congress for the possession of marijuana for personal use or for the not-for-profit transfer between adults of marijuana for personal use. Deems the possession of 100 grams or less of marijuana as personal use (one ounce or less for a not-for-profit transfer between adults). Allows the imposition of a civil penalty under the Controlled Substances Act for the public use of marijuana if such penalty does not exceed $100.


Read The Bill: H.R. 2943 - GovTrack.us
Reply With Quote
(#88 (permalink))
Old
xyzone (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 301
Join Date: Nov 2009
11-24-2009, 02:34 AM

Yeah, people deemed underage by their society should NOT use pot.

But dog cartoons they play in America are not going to stop them while it's still cool-rebellion-weed, they will do the opposite.
Reply With Quote
(#89 (permalink))
Old
futurebeast's Avatar
futurebeast (Offline)
JF Regular
 
Posts: 53
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: サン・ノゼ、カリフォルニア
Send a message via Skype™ to futurebeast
11-24-2009, 03:04 AM

Anyone who want's to use cannabis should be able to. If you want to stop babies from smoking then start a website telling people how bad it is. Print up shirts for all I care. Don't ask the state to fine and arrest people for it.

And if you were wondering, I do not smoke and certainly don't inhale.

"Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor liberty to purchase power."

and

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Benjamin Franklin, 1775

Gotta love the founding fathers.


哎呀, 我把我的 Jordan Kicks 放在哪里了? 糟糕!
Reply With Quote
(#90 (permalink))
Old
MMM's Avatar
MMM (Offline)
JF Ossan
 
Posts: 12,200
Join Date: Jun 2007
11-24-2009, 03:08 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by futurebeast View Post
Anyone who want's to use cannabis should be able to. If you want to stop babies from smoking then start a website telling people how bad it is. Print up shirts for all I care. Don't ask the state to fine and arrest people for it.

And if you were wondering, I do not smoke and certainly don't inhale.

"Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor liberty to purchase power."

and

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Benjamin Franklin, 1775

Gotta love the founding fathers.
You really think 8-year-olds should have the right to smoke marijuana if they want to?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Copyright 2003-2006 Virtual Japan.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6