|
||||
01-02-2010, 08:12 PM
Quote:
Nothing in the style of the book would imply that the author was from Japan or trying to imitate anything from Japan. The title is a marketing ploy, pure and simple. |
|
||||
01-02-2010, 08:30 PM
Quote:
(Read my first sentence carefully) I said that people use the word manga based on the general art style of the pictures. Basically when I look at the pictures it looks to me like it is more influenced by art styles in manga, hence why people call it manga, and why it makes sense. By using the word manga I knew exactly what to expect before I even looked at it. Quote:
I mean, nothing makes me think the author is from Japan (But then again, if it weren't for mangas being in Japanese, nothing would make me think the authors of Japanese mangas are from Japan either) But from what I can see they look like they are obviously trying to copy a style that you would find in a manga as opposed to say, an American comic. |
|
||||
01-02-2010, 09:10 PM
I don't think you are hearing me, Yuriyuri. If the artist was imitating the style of artwork that he had seen in Japanese manga, then I could understand the thinking behind the title. However, the style of the art in the book itself is distinct to Siku, and is unmistakably Western. Therefore calling it a "manga bible" is a misnomer on more than one level.
|
|
||||
01-02-2010, 09:16 PM
I don't think you are hearing me, and so I would have to say the same to you MMM.
The art to me looks like something I would see in a manga, and I would not call it "unmistakably Western". At this point I think I will just stop and say, there is no point in us continuing our discussion, since I have made up my mind, and you have yours, and I would rather get back to studying Japanese Although I think we could both agree that once again we can see just how subjective art really is (If it is in fact "art" to you lol) |
Thread Tools | |
|
|