JapanForum.com  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
(#21 (permalink))
Old
Ronin4hire's Avatar
Ronin4hire (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 2,353
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ウェリントン、ニュジランド
07-07-2010, 04:52 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by komitsuki View Post
He actually compared why the torpedo pieces couldn't be a Soviet design. While EU and the USA prohibited North Korea of getting sensitive western equipments. And he debunked that Reuters article... that claims that it was a German torpedo. Reuters reported that it was a Soviet design after the investigation "officially" claimed that it was a Soviet design.
Wait... has it been clearly established that it was a German made torpedo? I mean the only link was that a particular alloy composition was found that could be linked to a German-made weapon. I dont know much about torpedos... but the latter does not necessarily make the former true.

Anyway the Russian report will be released soon. Im interested to see what they have to say about the incident. It is pretty much beyond speculation that the Russians will come to the conclusion that a torpedo hit the Cheonan. Though whose torpedo they think it is will be interesting to find out.
Reply With Quote
(#22 (permalink))
Old
Sinestra's Avatar
Sinestra (Offline)
ショ ン
 
Posts: 612
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Where ever Miyuki Sawashiro is
Send a message via AIM to Sinestra Send a message via Yahoo to Sinestra
07-07-2010, 07:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aniki View Post
I'd like to see you try.
Aniki you know full well its called perception. what you see as evil i might not and vice verse. I find cross country banter about whose more evil hilarious for reason any intelligent person could figure out.


Reply With Quote
(#23 (permalink))
Old
steven (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 544
Join Date: Apr 2010
07-08-2010, 02:12 AM

All of the "news" stories I find are mostly quoting politicians... where's all of the hard evidence? Is this stuff available? If it is, shouldn't we be looking at that before this goes any further? I'd like to start seeing some facts about this incident.

It becomes more and more obvious that information and communication are extremely important. When you take them away people can justify anything including wars (without having to rely on facts or science to prove allegations).
Reply With Quote
(#24 (permalink))
Old
Ronin4hire's Avatar
Ronin4hire (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 2,353
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ウェリントン、ニュジランド
07-09-2010, 10:11 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by steven View Post
All of the "news" stories I find are mostly quoting politicians... where's all of the hard evidence? Is this stuff available? If it is, shouldn't we be looking at that before this goes any further? I'd like to start seeing some facts about this incident.
Um... there was a whole REPORT that was released regarding the incident and is available if you search "Cheonan incident report". Perhaps you might want to read that?

Investigation Result on the Sinking of ROKS "Cheonan"

The original report is at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote
(#25 (permalink))
Old
Sangetsu's Avatar
Sangetsu (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,346
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 東京都
07-09-2010, 02:00 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by komitsuki View Post
He actually compared why the torpedo pieces couldn't be a Soviet design. While EU and the USA prohibited North Korea of getting sensitive western equipments. And he debunked that Reuters article... that claims that it was a German torpedo. Reuters reported that it was a Soviet design after the investigation "officially" claimed that it was a Soviet design.

Whether you like it or not, 50% of South Koreans don't believe what you believe in. And they are getting stronge enough to challenge the president and the US government.

If it was really North Korea, how come the Russian government had hard time accepting the official findings? And Russia is no longer a close ally of North Korea. This only tells us that something's wrong with the official evidences.
Comical, challenge the US government? There would be no South Korea if it were not for America, would there? The vast majority of Korea's gross national product is consumed by America. America could bankrupt Korea with the signing of an unfavorable trade agreement. And it wouldn't harm America even 1%

Interesting news today about the arrival of three US Ohio class submarines in the Pacific region. Any one of these three submarines by itself surpasses the entire naval might of China, Japan, South Korea, and North Korea combined. The power of 3 of them together is scarcely imaginable. Tell me exactly what kind of challenge Korea can enforce against America, I'm very interested to hear about it.

And, for the sake of your argument, if your suppositions are entirely true, so what? It's not like anyone really needs to foment a phony crisis to make North Korea look bad, they do a wonderful enough job by themselves.
Reply With Quote
(#26 (permalink))
Old
komitsuki (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 997
Join Date: Feb 2009
07-13-2010, 03:40 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sangetsu View Post
Comical, challenge the US government? There would be no South Korea if it were not for America, would there? The vast majority of Korea's gross national product is consumed by America. America could bankrupt Korea with the signing of an unfavorable trade agreement. And it wouldn't harm America even 1%

Interesting news today about the arrival of three US Ohio class submarines in the Pacific region. Any one of these three submarines by itself surpasses the entire naval might of China, Japan, South Korea, and North Korea combined. The power of 3 of them together is scarcely imaginable. Tell me exactly what kind of challenge Korea can enforce against America, I'm very interested to hear about it.
Whoa there, chickenhawk. If you really hate North Korea, why won't you pull Rambo stunts and kill some Red Communist soldiers with your own hands. While I'll remain peaceful without thinking of military interventions. We young South Koreans know North Korea sometimes do crazy stuffs but we don't necessarily hate it. Think of this as tough love.

Here's a semi-neutral article for you: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/28/op...yers.html?_r=1

I was born in South Korea right before the 1988 Summer Olympics. This is a generation that usually sympathizes with North Korea beyond ideological reasons. To us, America antagonizing North Korea is irrational.

Second, finance is the bigger weapon than nuclear weapons IMO. Better worry about your country's epic amount of debt than some war vessels near China. You are better off kicking out Chinese military and industrial spies in the USA.

Third, Government protests Russia (website). As a conscious Korean-Canadian, I <3 Vladimir Putin and Dmitry Medvedev who try to bring better indirect stability to East Asia than the American foreign policies.

Quote:
And, for the sake of your argument, if your suppositions are entirely true, so what? It's not like anyone really needs to foment a phony crisis to make North Korea look bad, they do a wonderful enough job by themselves
On the other hand, thank goodness the pro-NK party just won the South Korean regional election last month. This wasn't a victory of democracy. This was how a South Korean pro-American party is collapsing from the inside a couple of years ago along with on-going financial-related corruptions.

I hope you understand some of the current situations in South Korea. I know it's very hard for average Americans to understand this.


JapanForum's semi-resident amateur linguist.
Reply With Quote
(#27 (permalink))
Old
Ryzorian (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,126
Join Date: Jun 2009
07-18-2010, 02:30 AM

Nobody is going to fight, so why worry about it? The U.S. isn't willing to lauch a strike against North Korea and it's 60,000 artillery pieces at the moment so why would North Korea give the U.S. a serious reason to attack? Kim Il may be a nut job but he isn't stupid. The US would wipe the floor with him in a major engagement. So the whole thing is just political postureing.
Reply With Quote
(#28 (permalink))
Old
Atredies (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 98
Join Date: Jun 2010
07-30-2010, 06:39 AM

check this out

S. Korean General Arrested for Leaking Battle Plans | Asia | English
Report: S. Korea General Arrested For Spying - Defense News

i guess many north korean spies exist in the south korean government and in the heart of american military bases stationed in south korea.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryzorian View Post
Nobody is going to fight, so why worry about it? The U.S. isn't willing to lauch a strike against North Korea and it's 60,000 artillery pieces at the moment so why would North Korea give the U.S. a serious reason to attack? Kim Il may be a nut job but he isn't stupid. The US would wipe the floor with him in a major engagement. So the whole thing is just political postureing.
very accurate sir.

Last edited by Atredies : 07-30-2010 at 06:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
(#29 (permalink))
Old
steven (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 544
Join Date: Apr 2010
07-30-2010, 07:13 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin4hire View Post
The original report is at the bottom of the page.
I appreciate it. That's what I was looking for. Unfortunately it wasn't what I was looking for. I didn't get a lot out of that but hearsay like pieces of evidence. I also found out how big a NK torpedo is. That's great... but although the document clearly states "There is no other plausible explination", other than that "the torpedo was fired by a North Korean submarine", the document doesn't do a very good job of proving that or even supporting it with any actual evidence or data.

25 experts from 10 top Korean expert agencies, 22 military experts, 3 experts recommended by the National Assembly, and 24 foreign experts consisting of four support teams from the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the Kingdom of Sweden. I'm sure there are some remarkable people in there... but what a vague description.

And no I don't go around reading these kinds of things all the time. Are all these kinds of documents like this?
Reply With Quote
(#30 (permalink))
Old
Ronin4hire's Avatar
Ronin4hire (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 2,353
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ウェリントン、ニュジランド
07-30-2010, 08:27 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by steven View Post
I appreciate it. That's what I was looking for. Unfortunately it wasn't what I was looking for. I didn't get a lot out of that but hearsay like pieces of evidence. I also found out how big a NK torpedo is. That's great... but although the document clearly states "There is no other plausible explination", other than that "the torpedo was fired by a North Korean submarine", the document doesn't do a very good job of proving that or even supporting it with any actual evidence or data.

25 experts from 10 top Korean expert agencies, 22 military experts, 3 experts recommended by the National Assembly, and 24 foreign experts consisting of four support teams from the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the Kingdom of Sweden. I'm sure there are some remarkable people in there... but what a vague description.

And no I don't go around reading these kinds of things all the time. Are all these kinds of documents like this?
What exactly were you looking for? The report gives its findings and its conclusions in fairly simple terms. It wasn't vague at all. In fact I think it was very clear who they blamed and why. I mean if it wasnt NK who was it? Now if you are a conspiracy theorist like komitsuki, then the report is not going to give you the answers because that is what they are disputing (I dont dismiss his theory altogether, though I dont really buy it. I mean if it was a false flag attack, Im still waiting for the follow up )
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Copyright 2003-2006 Virtual Japan.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6