|
||||
11-14-2010, 03:14 AM
Quote:
People bother because they want to attain knowledge (or at least that’s what I’d like to believe) not because they want that piece of paper. But the reality of the matter is that people are there to get a degree because society deemed it necessary to have that piece of paper despite whether or not you have the knowledge/experience/can prove yourself. It’s very easy for any Tom, Dick or Harry to get that piece of paper (no offense to any actual Tom, Dick or Harry that may read this). Already, you have people in this forum who are skilled at various things going through school because they HAVE to, not because they WANT to. Their efforts, their experience, their knowledge is under threat/ means next to nothing unless they have that degree. This is a massive flaw in the educational/career system if you ask me. Especially when this paper does nothing except prove that you got it. Oh and by the way, if I was dying and my only chance at survival was to have surgery, I’d be looking at the surgeon’s success rate. Not his/her college degree and definitely not at his/her grades. You can have a self-taught doctor -- with a degree from a third-world university that teaches next to nothing, mind you -- be more successful than the plaque-hanging Harvard graduate. That’s why internships exist ….especially in the medical field. You can have all the knowledge in the world and the degrees to point to it, but if the mortality rate skyrockets in your hands….then what? It’s okay… because you sir/ma’am, have that piece of paper? Same theory applies to lawyers, educators, artists, managers …you name it. Quote:
And also, why does it have to be “experience and a degree?” Why can’t it be “experience and education?” This is exactly the point I’ve been trying to make. A lot of people associate that paper with education when their relationship only goes so far. If it were up to me, there would be a really, really, really, really thick line dividing these two terms. As it stands, there seems to be a synonymous relationship between the two. People celebrate getting that piece of paper that means they can now walk into the world and try to get jobs that were otherwise inaccessible for whatever reason. Why can’t people celebrate the amount of knowledge they attained during their journey instead of that “paper?” Of course, this is up to them entirely. Quote:
|
|
||||
11-14-2010, 08:55 AM
Quote:
Edit; I will reply to the rest of your post later. But I'd just like to say that you're underestimating degrees. Most companies know when a degree is worthless, like A-Level social studies or something. In my Math and Physics degree, 40% of students fail, 55% get between 10/20 and 12/20. 4% between 12.1/20 and 14/20. And about 4 people get more. And it's Experience and degree, because most people are educated in one way or another! What the employer wants to know, is whether they're qualified to do a certain job. I know lots of very smart people. They're very cultured and have knowledge of many things. On paper, I'm smarter than them, and that's just not the case. But most of their knowledge is useless to most employers. I'm educated in certain fields, so even if I'm not as smart as my friends, I can do certain jobs better! |
|
||||
11-14-2010, 09:10 AM
Quote:
EDIT: And I think you're giving degrees too much credit. Quote:
While I find it hard to disagree with drop rates and success rates, How do you measure the skill of an individual who might be gifted theoretically but can't work practically? How do you begin assessing how the drop/success rates in your particular institution compares to another institution that might produce an equally, if not skilled, individual of the same field of study? Quote:
I may be reading too much into this but, judging from your statement about sociology and your considering your friends knowledge as useless, I seem to get the notion that because you're pursuing an education in mathematics and physics, you think you're more important. I apologize if I'm reading you wrong. |
|
||||
11-14-2010, 10:45 AM
I'm into my first year of college, next year I can take computer/programming lessons, but this first year it's just basic stuff, like math and all that boring parts ._.
HTML Code:
|
|
|||
11-14-2010, 11:08 AM
I don't know because I was never at UNI----------- too busy just surviving-- but Tony Blair was the one who encouraged more school leavers to go to University.
I do not believe that any education is wasted-- and that having a chance to spend a few years studying surely should improve hope of a good career. It seems too many students go in for IT or Media studies. look for the shortages in the real world; read the adverts in the Class newspapers who advertise for University graduates. Often when we are young we do not know what we really want to do in life-- so for those who Do- have an end in view they will try to attend courses that will enable them to pursue the desired career. I often think it depends on THE PARTICULAR COURSE and of course the Teachers? Lecturers. I believe everybody deserves a crack of the whip-- If there were more apprentice placements in the fields of need for the future-- especially practical skills. I worry for the students who will finish with enormous debts-- but struggle to find well paid employment. I should think that time off to work for nothing in certain Businesses or get work experience-- etc whilst still at UNI/college could be beneficial. |
|
||||
11-14-2010, 11:40 AM
And there you have it.
I'll call it quits with MisMissa's insightful post. Although I still hold my opinion, I don't see any resolution but a circular debate that will keep on revolving. I've had enough time wasted on this to be honest. I've voiced my opinion and so has everybody else. I'll let the T.C. and all those involved come to their own conclusions of what it all means to them. Thanks for a lively one. :P |
|
||||
11-14-2010, 05:53 PM
Quote:
Quote:
everything is relative and contradictory ~
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|