|
|||
11-12-2010, 05:56 AM
Quote:
Are you saying that 70 times more rape cases shown by The United Nations is all just coverup and it has NOTHING relevant? 10 percent of 70 times is still 7 times. And this isn't even my point. It's the fact that you automatically said Japan was like western counties "years ago" before checking all the facts. You could get the data by the UN in 10 seconds if you googled it. I KNOW you didn't know much about the crime rate in Japan and you just made a, prejudiced, assumption. My English brain totally understands what you are trying to condemn. But my Japanese brain is saying it doesn't have much ground. Yeah, using children for pornography is horrifying. But more brutal, direct, child abuse is abundant in the west than in Japan. I don't have any problem if you are culturally Japanese and condem it from a JAPANESE POINT OF VIEW. But you said that Japan was like western counties "years ago" and that has no logical ground. You didn't even know that Australia has 70 times the rape rate. Did you? Why all of the sudden Japanese pornography concerns you? Or will you say 70 times is completely bogus, and Australia actually has lower rape rate than Japan despite the number? |
|
|||
11-12-2010, 06:02 AM
Quote:
If I was in Australia I would condemn any issues that I felt were unfair in the treatment of rape victims there. I don't live there, I live here. It's the system that leads to the following that concerns me and I would think would be of concern to anyone regardless of nationality. Quote:
|
|
|||
11-12-2010, 06:15 AM
And cranks I probably know more about crime rates in Japan than you do. Not only do I actually live here but the low crime rates, especially in places like rural Hokkaido where I live, are one of the reasons I love living here. That doesn't mean there are no issues with how things like rape and child pornography are dealt with here.
|
|
||||
I dont know -
11-12-2010, 06:35 AM
The Japanese porn industry alone contributes so much to their economy. They rake in three times as much as Americas. As objectionable as some genres of porn may be, without it, Japan would not have progressed the way they have economically speaking. And all of the rape sold there as far as i have "researched" *cough* is staged and at least they aren't openly marketing full on nude 13 year old girls. So what if a few million a year bust a node over some sadistic fantasies involving bondage and molestation. At least they aren't repressing it. I mean what would the fat guy in his sweats do without it? "you know I think I might bound gag then rape my next door neighbors daughter. hm, sounds swell."
|
|
|||
11-12-2010, 06:36 AM
Quote:
You DID compare Japan to Australia. Then it SHOULD be compared to Australia. I'm not saying I hate you or anything. It's nice to talk to guys like you and that's why I hang out here. I just want to say if you want to dismiss 70 times the rape rate, you will need a very good explanation for it. 5 % of 70 times is still more than 3 times. And that's assuming Australian rape cases are reported 100% which I don't think sounds very convincing. Is it? |
|
||||
11-12-2010, 06:47 AM
Quote:
However I don't know what the comparison with Australia or the US was for. I mean unless child pornography is legal in Japan and I'm unaware of it. |
|
|||
11-12-2010, 06:52 AM
It is legal to have children pose provacatively in underwear and swim wear and there are whole magazines and films devoted to this genre. It is why this thread started. Kids are used here in the production of soft porn. It is a bit of a loophole in the law that the lumbering legal system here has yet to close. This is where the comparison with Australia and the US came in.
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|