JapanForum.com  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
(#161 (permalink))
Old
Ronin4hire's Avatar
Ronin4hire (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 2,353
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ウェリントン、ニュジランド
01-04-2011, 08:51 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by fluffy0000 View Post
The USSBS of 1946' was flawed not could have been flawed?
The part where he tries to account for it more than 30 years later.

IF true then this would only prove that the US lucked out rather than they made an informed decision that victory was only 2 a-bombs away.

Last edited by Ronin4hire : 01-04-2011 at 08:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
(#162 (permalink))
Old
fluffy0000's Avatar
fluffy0000 (Offline)
FJ to JF
 
Posts: 236
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: lost coast , kalifornia, uSa
01-04-2011, 09:06 AM

classic 'BS' dude. I'm bailing out.
Reply With Quote
(#163 (permalink))
Old
MMM's Avatar
MMM (Offline)
JF Ossan
 
Posts: 12,200
Join Date: Jun 2007
01-04-2011, 09:21 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin4hire View Post
The latter is definitely true.

The former.. well inot provable perhaps. Japan definitely reached out though.
So you are saying Japan was willing to agree to surrender, but America bombed it anyway? This isn't the history I have read.
Reply With Quote
(#164 (permalink))
Old
GoNative (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,063
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Inverloch, Australia
01-04-2011, 09:27 AM

Plus it's a ridiculous contention really. Japan was not only at war with the US. They were at war with many countries. If the US wasn't listening the Japanese could easily have made it clear to many other countries that they were willing to surrender. They didn't as far as I know. And the terms of the surrender that the allies were willing to accept were very clear. I haven't seen anything to suggest that prior to the bombing the Japanese were clearly saying they were williing to accept unconditional surrender. Not even Ronin's hero Pilger can show evidence of that.
Reply With Quote
(#165 (permalink))
Old
Ronin4hire's Avatar
Ronin4hire (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 2,353
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ウェリントン、ニュジランド
01-04-2011, 10:03 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoNative View Post
Plus it's a ridiculous contention really. Japan was not only at war with the US. They were at war with many countries. If the US wasn't listening the Japanese could easily have made it clear to many other countries that they were willing to surrender. They didn't as far as I know. And the terms of the surrender that the allies were willing to accept were very clear. I haven't seen anything to suggest that prior to the bombing the Japanese were clearly saying they were williing to accept unconditional surrender. Not even Ronin's hero Pilger can show evidence of that.
The Japanese made attempts to talk via neutral countries. It might not have resulted in surrender but we'll never know.

And I used Pilger as a summary.

He's not my entire argument.
Reply With Quote
(#166 (permalink))
Old
RickOShay (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 604
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA, formerly Shizuoka for 7 years.
01-04-2011, 10:59 AM

I am surprised nobody has mentioned operation ketsugo yet. I am sorry but after reading this can anybody really argue that Japan was wholeheartedly trying to surrender... i don't think so..


Volunteer Fighting Corps - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote
(#167 (permalink))
Old
nobora's Avatar
nobora (Offline)
Fan Ichigou
 
Posts: 1,665
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Neverland
01-04-2011, 11:52 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsbody70 View Post
EXACTLY. Yes.
Well its true.
Reply With Quote
(#168 (permalink))
Old
Ryzorian (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,126
Join Date: Jun 2009
01-04-2011, 11:58 PM

Japan theoretically atempted a third party through Russia, but of course since Russia was going to attack, that went nowhere. Other than that, the Military in Japan called the shots and they weren't going to accept the US "Unconditional" scenario. The Bombs gave the emperor the leverage he needed to push the Exstreamists into a corner. Even then, there was an atempted coo by the army.

There is also the possible idea the bombs were droped so quickly to get Japan to surrendor before Russian forces were fully engaged, because we had learned by then that Russia never gave anything back, and we didn't want a "Tokyo wall".

It's history anyway, it changed how the world does things, perhaps for the better, since there hasn't been a major war since then. All the other wars afterward, have been minor compared to WW2. The Bombs may not have ended all war, but up till now they have prevented World Wars.
Reply With Quote
(#169 (permalink))
Old
dogsbody70 (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,919
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South coast England
01-05-2011, 09:32 AM

I have to agree with ryzorian in his latter sentence.


Lets hope North Korea--will not re-ignite.


Japan knows exactly what it is like. So do we really want armageddon Now?
Reply With Quote
(#170 (permalink))
Old
termogard's Avatar
termogard (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 597
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ウラジオストク、沿海地方、露西亜
Smile ignition - 01-05-2011, 09:36 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsbody70 View Post
Lets hope North Korea--will not re-ignite.
It depends of "senior comrades" from chinese capital.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Copyright 2003-2006 Virtual Japan.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6