|
||||
reactors -
03-14-2011, 12:49 PM
Quote:
|
|
|||
03-14-2011, 03:38 PM
Quote:
|
|
||||
03-14-2011, 03:45 PM
Quote:
I'm very sad about what the people of Japan have been through, and the long road ahead of them. I wish I could do something, I really do. I hate this idea of just throwing money at a problem and hoping it goes away. but there's nothing else I can do...is there? ~hugs Japan~ Quote:
or is this a new one they're talking about? thnx boboloko for the sig! |
|
|||
03-14-2011, 03:46 PM
They were reporting today 'breaking news' of an M6 quake in Nagano. It never happend...not in Nagano at least. There were a few M6 quakes today off Fukushima and Ibaraki.
|
|
||||
western media -
03-14-2011, 03:47 PM
Quote:
Christopher D. Wilson, a reactor operator and later a manager at Exelon’s Oyster Creek plant, near Toms River, N.J., said, “normally you would just re-establish electricity supply, from the on-site diesel generator or a portable one.” Portable generators have been brought into Fukushima, he said. Fukushima was designed by General Electric, as Oyster Creek was around the same time, and the two plants are similar. The problem, he said, was that the hookup is done through electric switching equipment that is in a basement room flooded by the tsunami, he said. “Even though you have generators on site, you have to get the water out of the basement,” he said. or To pump in the water, the Japanese have apparently tried used firefighting equipment — hardly the usual procedure. But forcing the seawater inside the containment vessel has been difficult because the pressure in the vessel has become so great. One American official likened the process to “trying to pour water into an inflated balloon,” and said that on Sunday it was “not clear how much water they are getting in, or whether they are covering the cores.” The problem was compounded because gauges in the reactor seemed to have been damaged in the earthquake or tsunami, making it impossible to know just how much water is in the core. or Usually when a reactor is first shut down, an electric pump pulls heated water from the vessel to a heat exchanger, and cool water from a river or ocean is brought in to draw off that heat. But at the Japanese reactors, after losing electric power, that system could not be used. Instead the operators are dumping seawater into the vessel and letting it cool the fuel by boiling. But as it boils, pressure rises too high to pump in more water, so they have to vent the vessel to the atmosphere, and feed in more water, a procedure known as “feed and bleed.” When the fuel was intact, the steam they were releasing had only modest amounts of radioactive material, in a nontroublesome form. With damaged fuel, that steam is getting dirtier. Do you consider them examples of fearmongering? |
|
||||
03-14-2011, 04:11 PM
Quote:
As for the quake in Nagano, I felt a good shake at about 3:15 today, and I thought Fuji TV reported the quake as being centered in Nagano. One of the good things about the 24 hour news coverage is that I don't have to see the retarded variety shows with the bizarrely dressed "celebrities" doing the same thing night after night. In comparison I almost miss the western "shock journalism" programs. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|