|
|||
03-30-2011, 05:54 PM
Quote:
Gee what a shame you can't post more in these terrible times!!! LoL |
|
|||
03-30-2011, 10:19 PM
Quote:
stay strong down there and keep your positive thoughts going! Japan won't ever go down like this. And please don't be another one of those foreigner's who just leave the Japanese alone and who do a runner. I look up too both of you in this terrible situation! but I'm still trying to figure out why I can't post more then 1 post a day |
|
||||
radiation-contaminated water -
03-31-2011, 12:42 AM
Efforts to remove radiation-contaminated water filling up at a troubled reactor building and an underground trench connected to it at the crisis-hit Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant have hit a snag, casting a shadow on restoration of the vital cooling functions at the site, the government's nuclear safety agency said Wednesday.
The evolving nuclear crisis also showed no signs of abating, as the agency said the same day the highest concentration of radioactive iodine-131 was detected Tuesday in a seawater sample taken near the plant's drainage outlets in the Pacific Ocean. The density was 3,355 times the maximum level permitted under law. Workers rushed to pump out radiation-polluted water that has been filling up the basement of the No. 1 reactor's turbine building and the tunnel-like trench connected to it, but they found out Tuesday a tank accommodating the water from the building had become full, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said. .................................................... Experts had suggested that the emergency injection of seawater into the Nos. 1-3 reactor cores to cool them down would eventually lead to their dismantlement, as salt and impure substances in seawater causes equipment corrosion. Nishiyama said it is expected to take at least 20 years to finish the procedures to decommission the six-reactor Fukushima plant. Katsumata said TEPCO considers it as an option to cover the troubled reactors with ''stone coffins'' made of concrete and iron, a solution adopted in the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear crisis. Kyodo News |
|
|||
03-31-2011, 03:06 AM
The other thread was closed, people get too emotional at times... Whatever:
Quote:
I still advise people in the area 80km around Fukushima plants to leave the area as soon as possible. Quote:
It might be interesting for some people. Fukushima Daini is 10km afar from Fukushima Daichi. The smoke lasted for approximatly one hour. Quote:
What they don't say is the fact that to entomb it they need to cool it down constantly for a long period of time. It may take 2-3 years otherwise the concrete would accelerate the core meltdown followed by corrosion into the ground. They still can't stop plutonium leakage into the sea. |
|
||||
03-31-2011, 03:48 AM
Quote:
Does your advisement carry more weight than those who have advised 40km, 100km, or 1000miles? Has there been any more thought or research put into it than the advisement of 1000miles we received from a certain hyperbolic, callous, self righteous "adviser"? Yes, shit is going down. Yes, it sucks. No, fear and improperly justified action or reaction is never the right course of action, in any situation. edit: I'd like to add that when I see quotes and carefully chosen facts superimposed with opinion and the distinction isn't being made clear, that sophism is at large and those more susceptible to it are the victims of reason. |
|
|||
03-31-2011, 04:35 AM
Quote:
US NRC also recommed this distance for American citizen residing in Japan. Warden Message | Embassy of the United States Tokyo, Japan This distance has also been adopted by British embassy. Any British nationals currently within 80km of the facility are advised to leave the area or take shelter indoors. Japan travel advice I ain't nuclear scientist and sure cannot provide you the technical ar scientific details. But i believe even if we are adviced to 'leave the area' (hopefully you are not allegic to the phrase) on PRECAUTIONARY ground, i will be more that happy to accept the advice. Precaution and prevention where and when is reasonable is always better than aftermath reaction to problem. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|