|
||||
03-18-2011, 12:20 PM
Quote:
Most of the "things" Japan need has a monetary value, food, blankets, medication... tell me one thing that is not associated with a monetary value. Money doesn't go there and become cash in hand to the Japanese Government or its citizen. It is used to help fund whatever relief effort that is happening there now. I can volunteer to go there, but I will still need to fly there , I will need to a place to stay, to be fed. Even if I fund myself to do all that, the people there will have need that can only be satisfy with money. The fact that we see people going in and helping already indicate that its not MISPLACED. If money goes to a charity organization, and they organization never show up to help, then its misplaced. Again, the effort itself, the material, all cost money... |
|
||||
03-18-2011, 02:49 PM
Quote:
|
|
||||
03-18-2011, 04:13 PM
Quote:
I have plenty of all of that, but I have no logistical way of getting it to the people who need it in the disaster areas, and certainly no way to get it there quickly enough to be of real use. I live in a rural area; there's no collection point here. It would be ridiculous and impractical for me to pack a suit-case and go out there to help- I have no training, i'd just be a burden to the relief effort. By donating to the Red Cross however, my money can leap in an instant to a place where EVERYTHING the people need can be purchased at source, in bulk, given to trained professionals to distribute and make a real difference TODAY. I have, in effect, donated baby milk and blankets, I just haven't had the chance to handle them personally. I've helped feed the private volunteer teams and keep them well equipped, so they can enter an area full of struggling survivors and yet not put more pressure on limited resources just by being there, and I've helped maintain producers nearer the area in an arguable tough economic patch- not every business can afford (even if they want to) to give everything away for free. And I've bought whatever was actually needed -most- at the time; not just whatever I guessed from a long list of items required. I may have bought a coffin, or a body bag. Or something else I could never get hold of myself like dialysis tubes or would never have otherwise thought of. The government of any country can't donate to the Red Cross; almost all it's revenue comes from private donation, and the Red Cross by policy doesn't invoice for it's help- it would be unethical for it to bill Japan for aid when it has to date never been -paid- to help any country. That's the point of them; they help everyone, regardless of colour, creed, history or bank balance. You may consider it wasted money, and wasted charity, but the money WILL make a difference and making relief efforts easier (even if they according to you are already well-funded and therefore easy in that respect) can hardly be a bad thing in my opinion, and for many people around the world, the only alternative is quite simply to do nothing. That's no alternative at all. |
|
||||
again sorta not -
03-18-2011, 04:36 PM
Quote:
The Red Cross gets federal & state grants and the Red Cross can also purchase supplies from the military and use government facilities--military personnel can actually be assigned to duty with the Red Cross. The leading administrators and officials of the ( ARC ) Red Cross are almost always drawn from the corporate boardroom or the military high command. Among the past chairs and presidents of the Red Cross are seven former generals or admirals and one ex-president. As Richard Walden, of Operation USA, wrote in the Los Angeles Times, In other and past disasters "FEMA and the affected states had reimbursed the Red Cross under pre-existing* contracts for emergency shelter and other disaster services. |
|
|||
03-18-2011, 05:15 PM
i never donated any of my money to new zealand and i am no longer a new zealand citizen for few years. i find it pointless to donate my money to an economic havoc.
i however donated money to japan and i never regret my decision. japan is under a huge debt waiting to explode and it is worth a donation. this is called charity and this is love to the fellow friends. |
|
||||
03-18-2011, 05:51 PM
Really? I did not know that was the case in America. British Red Cross isn't; it's recognized as one of the three Voluntary Aid Services, but it's not a government faculty in it's own right, and none of the current heads of management have any background in government or military.
|
|
||||
again sorta -
03-18-2011, 06:01 PM
The UK Red Cross, as with all IFRC member societies, operate first and foremost an Emergency Response service, which supports the statutory and governmental* Emergency services in times of crisis, in accordance with the duty of Red Cross and Red Crescent national societies to be auxiliaries in the humanitarian services of their governments*.
Dude, check it out* |
Thread Tools | |
|
|