|
||||
03-23-2011, 03:55 AM
I don`t know why I`m bothering to reply to this... I guess I just find it incredibly amusing that someone thinks that it would be possible to move the epicenters of large earthquakes far far away from their fault lines.
I`m sure they do - but the tsunami reached California. You would be willing to sacrifice some other location with your magical method of moving an epicenter? Moving it a bit isn`t going to do anything but reduce the amount of shaking felt - the difference in tsunami size would be negligible. Unless, of course, you can somehow just take all the energy far far far away from the fault line and drop it in Antarctica or the like. |
|
|||
03-23-2011, 07:22 AM
In February 2010 prospective epicenter of earthquake in Carpathians shifted towards Arctic regions to the north of Iceland, but energy emission has occurred in Iceland. The old volcano there has revived.
Energy of a wave of a tsunami inversely proportional to a square of distance to epicenter. Time for discussion was spent too much and it needs to be finished. Earthquakes on the east coast of Honshu proceed. Contacts to Japanese biopower experts for transfer of the practical information are necessary to me. |
|
|||
03-23-2011, 09:54 AM
Quote:
The earthquake they are talking about is the Tokai earthquake, it has YET to happen, and has been predicted to happen for like the past 60 years... what you have posted is nothing special or revealing. |
|
|||
03-23-2011, 01:56 PM
Quote:
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|