|
|||
11-19-2011, 01:18 AM
Quote:
|
|
|||
11-19-2011, 01:24 AM
Quote:
Well, if it bothers my GF, question comes on how many more people are bothered by it? Its not like i am AGAINST you or kanji in particular, but there's no reason to hold on to something that is illogical and difficult and which can be replaced by japanese. Fact is that Japanese developed hiragana, and it worked well without Kanji, its only been introduced to not fall behind chinese culture and economy at the time. That Japan has a 0 or 100% literacy rate, has got not much to do with its illogical basis. And was therefore ignored by me, not for offensive reasons, but i simply could not relate any value on it topic whise. But you might see that differently. |
|
|||
11-19-2011, 09:10 AM
Quote:
As a native Japanese speaker, I say it'd be sooo inconvenient to have to read and write Japanese without kanji. I can't imagine how irritating it'd be if I had to read a paper/novel or even manga without it. I used to read for my nephew some picture books which were written without any kanji or katakana, everything was in hiragana, and it was sooo hard for me to understand the meaning of each sentence at the very first sight, and therefore I had to read the stories veeery slowly, because you need to understand the meaning of each word before reading it aloud, which takes far more time without kanji. When you're not sure if a word means 'a bridge' or 'chopsticks,' you can't pronounce it correctly. |
|
|||
11-19-2011, 11:51 AM
No.
1: referendums are stupid 2: kanji are cool 3: kanji are useful. Even in English we don't always stick purely to our alphabet, we have quite a few 'kanji' of our own- $,2,5,%,@,etc... And I don't find kanji hard at all, that's the easy part of learning Japanese, learning vocabulary is the hard part. |
|
||||
11-19-2011, 05:59 PM
Eliminating kanji would be much like eliminating punctuation and "proper" spelling in English.
I have yet to meet anyone Japanese over the age of, say, 10 - or rather the maturity of a ten year old - who has honestly expressed a belief that kanji should be eliminated. And even most lower grade schoolers only feel that way because their kanji homework is a pain. Seriously, I think that either your "Japanese partner" is trying to humor you by telling you she thinks kanji are hard and a pain because you have trouble with them, is obsessed with English-language-culture to the point of bashing anything Japanese to win culture points... Or really has the mentality of a child. Or maybe they are "Japanese" but grew up outside Japan where kanji have been a chore and of no use in real day to day life? It is just so hard for me to understand why someone could think Japanese would be better off without kanji. It really just stuns me that anyone familiar with the language could feel that way. Reading Japanese without kanji is even worse than English written phonetically and with no punctuation. There is so much that makes it incredibly slow and laborious to read and comprehend. I will second what Sumippi said about reading children's books. It is *hard* to read something aloud and fluidly to a child without going over it ahead of time when it is written all in hiragana. Even when it is something incredibly simple, it takes longer than reading kanji heavy newspaper. |
|
|||
11-19-2011, 06:25 PM
Quote:
Regarding what you said about the American metric system: I think it does make sense. Which would be easier to envision? A child that is 3 feet tall, or a child that is 36 inches tall? Or I could say, "My house is 5,280 feet from the school." Wouldn't it be easier to say my house is a mile from school? We need inches to define things that are smaller than a foot (obviously). Anyways- No, do not remove Kanji from the Japanese language. I enjoy learning it; I actually think its fun. If you have a problem with learning that part of the Japanese language, than maybe the language isn't the right one for you to learn. |
|
||||
11-19-2011, 06:33 PM
Quote:
10mm = 1cm, 100cm = 1m, 1000m = 1km, etc If you were asked out of the blue how many feet there were in a mile, would you know? If you were asked how many... umm... pints in a gallon, would you be able to answer without intensive thought? |
|
|||
11-19-2011, 06:36 PM
Quote:
I do understand what you're getting at, and I have to say you're right, and the other asker. I misunderstood at first what he was saying. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|