|
||||
09-04-2010, 09:48 PM
Quote:
Quote:
The only people it is a controversy to are the nationalistic Japanese who want to retain their "culture" or people in the industry perhaps. Quote:
|
|
||||
09-04-2010, 10:05 PM
Im not going to be around in this discussion much longer as judging by the flak MissMisa is getting, it seems we are going around in circles because the whaling/dolphin hunting apologists are not listening.
I just want to say that here is the summary of this discussion Anti hunters "Whaling is bad because of X, Y and Z" Apologists "But factory farms are bad! and anti whalers are racist!" Anti hunters "What the f*ck? Im not a racist! And this has nothing to do with farms. I am against them too!" Apologists "This is about culture! You are a Westerner and Westerners have farms!" Anti hunters "Culture is not a reasonable defense and I may be a Westerner but we are not all the same!" At least that is how the discussion has gone thus far. Of course there has been some attempt to address X Y and Z and that is fine but its becoming messy because of all the other shit that is going on. I am only going to respond to points addressing X Y and Z from now on. Any mention of farms, culture etc I am going to ignore because it is not relevant. Finally I just want to say to cranks... You USED to be on the anti-whaling side but changed sides because apparently "anti whalers are racist?" What a cop out. Have your own moral reasons for being against whaling instead of "following the group". It makes me think that the only reason you are defending whaling is because you feel like you are defending Japan. That is really sad because you are becoming a nationalist because of nationalists in the West. |
|
|||
09-04-2010, 10:33 PM
Quote:
I asked for the "logical reason" why self-awareness matters solely to animals, and ONLY in the case of human babies other factors matter. But in the following sentences, it seems we finally have a common ground, so it doesn't matter anymore. Quote:
|
|
||||
09-04-2010, 10:36 PM
Quote:
Tell me cranks.. why are you against eating babies? (Or do you like eating babies?) Quote:
I trust SCIENTISTS whose specialty is studying whales and dolphins. I dont trust the Japanese whaling industry or their apologists. |
|
||||
09-05-2010, 12:07 AM
Quote:
|
|
||||
09-05-2010, 06:05 AM
Quote:
To be honest MissMisa has much more relevant and stronger arguments than you. I just wanted her to know that in the end, it doesn't matter what foreigners think, we will decide for ourselves. your self-aware argument is the weakest I ever came across for two reasons: 1) you never gave proof. only the opinions of bios scientists. They are the only ones that say whales have a high level of self-awareness. It's not up to me to devise a proof to test self-awareness. 2) There is no consensus that self-awareness is more important than say awareness of surroundings, ability to feel fear, to feel pain , ability to use tools, level of intelligence, etc... Self-awareness as the litmus test defining what we can eat or not eat is purely your opinion and yours alone. you can have your opinion just as MissMisa can have hers and I can have mine. But it's no more relevant than anyone else opinion and the final right to choose a direction goes to Japan.. |
|
||||
09-05-2010, 06:35 AM
Quote:
you just dont get how the wild life works, dont you? humans can't use predetor spiecies in almost anywere...they are just not so usefull as the rest of the spiecies. and problem with the whole nature starts when people like you decide its a good thing to save those predators who naturally are allways in smaller numbers that the rest of the wildlife. im saying you that lifes here for the rest of wildlife (not just it. also farmers) are gone down because foxes are so many and none needs them. and govorment is going to take action when its all totally FD UP like allways. so please. continiue eating your echo-eggs and everything else echo because its also a load of crap and i like the idea you eating it. |
|
||||
09-05-2010, 06:43 AM
Quote:
I didn't say killing foxes was bad, either. I said, FOX HUNTING is bad. By what you are talking about, you know nothing of the actual 'sport' of fox hunting. The majority of people in England didn't agree with it, so it was banned. Democracy! The jury is still out for me on culling animals to save others, I don't know enough about it to comment. |
|
||||
09-05-2010, 06:52 AM
Quote:
having a ban on fox hunting is wrong. we had that ban and you can read what happened - we have more of them than we have ever had only this time we also dont need them. no hunter is going to waste his time on controling spiecies in which he has no gain. so its up to the goverment and things will have to get even worst for them to notice and take action which will cost money. and really? upper classes in england actually managed to drive foxes to the extincion whith their horse back, whiskey drinking, bloodhound gathering parties?? |
Thread Tools | |
|
|