|
||||
01-12-2010, 01:09 AM
Quote:
|
|
||||
01-12-2010, 08:28 AM
Quote:
And yeah, technically P2P sharing isn't illegal in and of itself. For example, I can share movies made in the 1910s and that is legal. I can share on P2P something I wrote, or a Shakespeare play in the public domain. However, sharing a copy of Genki or Yookoso or Minna no Nihongo is definitely copyright infringement, which is illegal. It can even be a criminal act if you share it enough. And don't confuse morality with legality. I happen to agree with you: I believe it is moreally permitted to give someone a pirated copy of a textbook so they can evaluate it and decide whether they want to make a purchase. However, that does not affect its legality. You get sued based on laws, not morals. Thus, MMM (rightly) is concerned with policing law, not morality. Well, he might be concerned with policing some morality, but only because it's an unspoken site policy. For example, I hesitate every time I think about using a profanity here despite its complete legality. |
|
||||
01-12-2010, 07:56 PM
Ah, sorry to get you guys riled up. Don't get me wrong, I was glad that MMM told me (I even said so). I was just saying that the whole P2P debate in general makes me mad, but I wasn't directing it at anyone in particular on this board. Just stating my opinion. I have no intention of breaking the rules here and I see the logic in them and agree. You don't don't want any trouble and I understand the reason for that rule. As I am a user of the site, it's my duty to obey these rules or I don't deserve to be here. Everything is peachy-keen, I'll do as I'm told. Sorry if it seemed like I was back-sassing you guys.
|
|
||||
01-13-2010, 12:49 AM
Quote:
And I think MMM's comment was more prompted by what I said than what you did, since I brought the morality/legality divide into issue. He's a good dude. I think you are, too. |
|
|||
01-13-2010, 12:52 AM
thanks for the many comments.
@StonerPenguin: stop arguing whether its legel to download it or not, this is not what I've asked. And yes, I know how to use google and rapidshare but I won't certainly download the book. First, because learning japanese is more than a hobby to me, it's like a investment in the feature. Second, using books is much more confortable than using low quality images. @SceptileMaster, KyleGoetz: well, I would be very happy If I knew 500 kanji, yes indeed... but I'm not that far anyway, what book is you are talking about? I mean Yookoso, I didn't find anything close than "Yookoso! Study Japanese language, Kanji; learn about Japanese travel, culture, life, music (JPOP) and more" (from where I got the link to this forum in the first place ) Well, I can remeber rather quickly new kanji. But I also realized that remebering them is not always what it matters because if I don't use them frequently then I forget them (well I recognize them when reading). This is a problem, even if I buy a book with kanji to learn from, it would be a waste of time. There must be a better solution to this problem. of course I want to learn as much kanji as possible, but I would try to learn them when I can use them more frequently, that means when I can write text without consulting my text book for nearly every sentence. That's why I wanted to know in the first place, whether Minna no Nihongo 2 is as good as the first one. This question remains unanswered edit: typos fixed |
|
||||
01-13-2010, 01:57 AM
Quote:
The textbook my uni uses. In my opinion, the best two kanji books are these: Amazon.com: Kanji ABC: A Systematic Approach to Japanese Characters (0676251819571): Andreas Foerster, Naoko Tamura: Books Amazon.com: kanji in context The first is a pretty unique system, and I thought it was good. The other I used in Japan. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|