|
|||
11-14-2007, 02:32 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I did discover a cool feature on my home computer where I can draw with my mouse the rough shape of a kanji and it brings up a list of options of ones it could be ! I'm going to have a try with it when I get home tonight. I can offer maths help if anyone would like that in exchange for the rest of the kanji? I'm teaching calculus 5, and statistics 1/2 to seniors in high school this year, so I'm more than happy to help out with those. |
|
|||
11-14-2007, 07:18 PM
Well take for example as an extreme the 18 strokes one. I recognise the 'sun'/'day' primitive bit on the left, but the bit on the right looks like nothing more than a homogenous blob of black ink.
Using the device I mentioned in my last post, I think that the character is: 曜 But there is no way of me being sure. It looks sort of similar . |
|
||||
11-14-2007, 07:28 PM
Quote:
|
|
||||
11-14-2007, 09:40 PM
Quote:
No, wait. I just checked up on the Heisig method. I AM familiar with it. I don`t know a single person who actually used it and was able to apply it to real life Japanese. It removes the kanji from common sense order and from context, so you`re left with these little floating characters that are connected with meanings that do not apply in real Japanese. And with images associated with the kanji that actually impair correct deduction of the meaning in unfamiliar words. Seriously, it is an example of how NOT to create a natural textbook among linguistics scholars. Not to mention it uses supposed histories of characters that besides being incorrect, are downright racist in some cases. (I do hope they`ve taken some of those out in newer editions... Like the references to cannibalism, etc) In other words - The Heisig method is not a good method. Unless, of course, your only aim is to somehow remember these characters - void of proper meaning and context. |
|
|||
11-15-2007, 04:49 PM
Quote:
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|