|
||||
10-31-2009, 12:15 PM
I have to say that when I first obtained my card by visitng the local ward office and being figerprinted, I did find it ratjher intimidating as besides the wording "alien", we were taght in Australia from a young age that crminals are fingerprinted. I find it sad that they still feel the need to make it compulsory for foreigners to hold the card.
Cheers - Oz |
|
||||
10-31-2009, 03:38 PM
Quote:
You do have to be fingerprinted when entering the country though - that`s been in effect for... 3 years now? Maybe 4? I haven`t been out of the country since that law was passed, so have never had my fingerprints taken. |
|
|||
10-31-2009, 06:05 PM
Quote:
Apart from on the occasion of immigration / emmigration there is no reason to take that information and even then it should be destroyed upon returning to your home country. I understand its important for government to be able to count people entering and leaving the country and to ensure that those people who enter leave when they are supposed to but in 99% (perhaps 100%) of situations it will be of no benefit to me or anyone else having my fingerprint or retina. I am still just as likely to be a victim of crime whether everyone has their fingerprint / retina / DNA on a database / ID card or not. I should add that I am not vehrmently opposed to having that information in an alien card when I visit Japan but I am opposed to the rolling out of such forms of data gathering when a government applies it to its whole population. |
|
|||
10-31-2009, 06:11 PM
Your definition of Orwellian is so ridiculous that the only places left for you are a hand full of third world countries.
|
|
||||
10-31-2009, 06:34 PM
Quote:
Why are you opposed to such forms of data gathering when it applies to a whole population? |
|
||||
10-31-2009, 07:48 PM
Quote:
If don't care about the damage that has been done to us by terrorist, I hope you don't call yourself American. I for example lost some friends and a family member in the 9/11 attack, I love it if we took measures to prevent it. Even if it decreases chances by 1%. Future holds retina and fingerprint identification, whether you like it or not. (My guess: In the future you will get off an aircraft and upon exit to the landing hall you will hear the tanoy announce that you should remove any sunglasses or any item covering your eyes. From over 800 yards away a multiple scan will be in progress and it will be flicking through each traveller in recognition of their Citizenship. All unrecognised travellers will be funnelled into numbered channels for country verification and status checks. Anyone travelling on a non chip compatible passport will be refused entry. ) Quote:
"OMFGZ invasion of privacy" " "no waii I haven't done nothing wrong!!!" "Thats for criminals" "OMFG my forefathers left me rights!!!" "Its violating my constitutional rights" I find people who think that their country's laws apply to wherever they are traveling, very ignorant. |
|
|||
11-01-2009, 02:41 PM
Quote:
You are again trying to use fear as a reason to take these measures into place but didn't address the fact that you have to actually know everyone on that planes intentions to know if they are going to hijack it. Your fingerprint does not give away any information about whether you are a terrorist. You are right about not calling myself an American, I don't. When I am in another country, as much as I may fleetingly begrudge being treated with indignance on entering another country and having to give my fingerprint and retina I accept that "them's the breaks". However, in my own country where I am a citizen I should be allowed to go out my own business without being criminalized. Unless of course I commit a crime, but that's not what I am arguing. It is worrying that you think rights and privacy are 'small things', clearly the system has broke you down. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|