|
|||
07-28-2011, 12:36 PM
In the case of Niseko Town it isn't really that much of a tourist town at all. There is an excellent farmers market at the Niseko View Plaza but other than that not much else that draws in many tourists. And the plaza is situated beyond the main street that has had a facelift. I've never seen many tourists in the town proper and there are no touristy shops. The aesthetic difference though between Niseko Town and the Kutchan (where I lived) was incredible.
I agree that if a place becomes overly touristy and if things aren't done well it can all come off as contrived. In the examples I've given above though I don't think that's the case at all. Often, like in the case of Niseko Town, it doesn't take a huge amount of money to change things for the better. They did not demolish any of the existing houses or buildings. Only the facades facing the main street had to comply with a consistent theme. The paving and widening of the sidewalks was a nice touch and putting the powerlines underground for about 1.5km's along the main street has made a huge difference. Also incredibly simple things like restricting street advertising signs and maintaining planter boxes with flowers in summer makes a huge difference. It didn't feel contrived or purely done for tourism. It was just a mayor who cared about the aesthetics of his town and got the locals on board with his vision. If this were to happen more often throughout Japan then there wouldn't be so many incredibly ugly towns! I mean you'd have to agree this would be a good thing wouldn't it? There just seems to have been some disconect in Japan for really planning for beauty in their towns, houses and other buildings in the modern era since the war. There's some great stuff of course, like in the examples I've shown above but I'd like to see more! |
|
|||
07-28-2011, 02:10 PM
Quote:
(I find we are on the computer at the same time. Just saying for no reason.) |
|
|||
07-28-2011, 02:25 PM
Quote:
But a condo is really really/ fancy I guess, But it's not really fancy, I don't know how to say it. Nice. Condos have cool stuff. I stayed in a condo in Ocean City once before. My aunt owns three condos and the whole family stayed. |
|
||||
07-28-2011, 02:54 PM
In laying underground the power transmission line, the charge is 20 times or more. The time twice or more hangs in restoration from the disaster.
Great Hanshin earthquake - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (The region where the power transmission line had been laid underground became harsh conditions) Niseko and Yuzawa are immediately before the government finance failure. (The entire Hokkaido is a bad debt) It is a tax of people in Tokyo, Osaka, and Aichi for the construction cost. When the tax revenue doesn't increase because of laying underground the power transmission line, it becomes a a municipality under rehabilitation. The right of self-government is lost. Cryptanalysis is necessary for you. set a goal:English at the same level as Johan Cruyff |
|
|||
07-29-2011, 12:48 AM
Quote:
You learn something new everyday @My blog in Japan, trips, experiences and life as a foreign student. http://www.wentblogging.com @Advice for living in Japan, from grocery shopping to renting an apartment. http://japan.wentblogging.com @僕のブロッグ。日本での経験、旅、留学生の生活。http://www.wentblogging.com/index_jp.php |
|
||||
07-29-2011, 01:31 AM
Condos tend to be better maintained and are often built a bit nicer than buildings built for rental purposes.
As a rental apartment is maintained by the landlord, the public spaces of the building tend to get minimal attention... But with a condo, the entire building is maintained by the residents, so the public areas tend to be given a lot more effort. The people who actually take care of the building *live* there rather than come by every once in a while. When something breaks, it is usually fixed very quickly... With rentals, unless it`s vital, it may not be fixed at all (it`s up to the landlord.) Otherwise, they basically are the same thing. A building that has multiple units with a different family living in each one. The biggest difference is that in one, you pay by the length of time you live there and nothing is yours - and the other, you own everything inside the structural walls of your part, a percentage of the structure itself and a percentage of the land. |
|
|||
07-29-2011, 03:34 AM
Quote:
If even a small percentage of the money spent on such projects was put into helping out towns to have a facelift it would make a huge difference. But of course with how the political system works in Japan the huge amounts of pork barrel projects that go on means there's little money to go around for anything else. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|