Are Japanese guys the same "size" as Americans?

[dogsbody70]

you have a cheek asking personal questions about nyrorin. where is your respect?

[XxBiancaxX]

Wtf... Eeeeeeeer... i believe that all this "size" thing is based in Stereotypes o____oUu

[RobinMask]

Originally Posted by dogsbody70

you have a cheek asking personal questions about nyrorin. where is your respect?

To be fair this whole thread is about penis sizes . . . when someone comments on what they've seen, I have to ask what then is "too personal"? I mean, sure asking someone how many people they've dated is personal, but in light of the original topic . . . is it really?

[dogsbody70]

well sorry but i think the original question is ridiculous.


not really a suitable subject.


maybe I'm old fashioned but to be bothered about the size of the male nether regions--URGH.


if you love somebody you don't think about things like that.

I think it is intrusive and rude question

surely there are better subjects to discuss on this forum.


more fool those who actually care how a male is hung.

also I have great respect for nyrorin--and feel that some members are way too inquisitive about her.

i do not like to see her name bandied about.

[Nyororin]

I very much appreciate your concern.

I did choose to answer the question with my own experience, so I can`t relaly complain about someone being inquisitive.
I am a fairly open person, so don`t really mind being asked things as long as they`re not insulting. I can see how the question would be pertinent to the discussion - if I had only seen one of each, it would hardly be enough to form a fair opinion.

Anyway though, I have been married for 10 years now, so can`t comment on whether there have been any significant changes in the world over that time.

[RealJames]

about the love thing;
if you're lookin for love then it's destined to fail if genital proportions are a factor...

although, many of us certainly aren't looking for love haha, for many years I picked my women based purely on very superficial and on factors that would no doubt change within years, but who cares when your time-scope is days or weeks at most!

I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of sex on this earth is done between two people who have no love for each other and are in fact more interested in genital proportions than character traits

[myk]

Originally Posted by RealJames

about the love thing;
if you're lookin for love then it's destined to fail if genital proportions are a factor...

although, many of us certainly aren't looking for love haha, for many years I picked my women based purely on very superficial and on factors that would no doubt change within years, but who cares when your time-scope is days or weeks at most!

I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of sex on this earth is done between two people who have no love for each other and are in fact more interested in genital proportions than character traits

go tell that to the saints over in the "looks or personality" thread

[RobinMask]

Originally Posted by myk

go tell that to the saints over in the "looks or personality" thread

In that thread the empthasis seems to be on long-term relationships, whereas in this thread it's more about the sexual . . . the arguments in either thread can't be applied to the other easily, as they argue different things.

Also I took a quick look at the other thread. The arguments here are valid, the arguments there are valid, and everyone has their own views - Dogs, James, the original poster . . . all unique values and beliefs. No one view is better than another, so why should he - or any of us - go into another thread and by your implication "prove 'em wrong"?

[myk]

Originally Posted by RobinMask

In that thread the empthasis seems to be on long-term relationships, whereas in this thread it's more about the sexual . . . the arguments in either thread can't be applied to the other easily, as they argue different things.

Also I took a quick look at the other thread. The arguments here are valid, the arguments there are valid, and everyone has their own views - Dogs, James, the original poster . . . all unique values and beliefs. No one view is better than another, so why should he - or any of us - go into another thread and by your implication "prove 'em wrong"?

maybe i should have loaded that post up with emoticons so as to indicate a joke

[RobinMask]

Originally Posted by myk

maybe i should have loaded that post up with emoticons so as to indicate a joke

Ah, sorry. Humour doesn't translate too well online, and I can't say I'm perceptive to it at the best of times. No worries in that case, lol.